Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3164 (UTT)

KUMKUM AND ANR v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/148/2025 · 2025-03-10

Ashish Naithani, G Narendar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures 2025:UHC:1635-DB COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS 10.03.2025 WPCRL No. 148 OF 2025 Hon'ble G. Narendar, C.J. Hon’ble Ashish Naithani, J. Mr. Ravindra Singh Rawat, larend counsel for the petitioners and Mr. S.S. Chauhan, learned Deputy8 Advocate General with Mr. Vikash Uniyal, learned Brief Holder for the State of Uttarakhand. 2. Learned DAG submits that he has been instructed to submit to the Court that the private respondents, i.e. respondent Nos. 3 to 5 were called by the second respondent; and that they have been counselled and the private respondent Nos. 3 to 5 have given an undertaking not to harm the petitioners; that the second respondent would be continuously assessing the threat perception and would act accordingly. 3. The submission is placed on record. 4. The writ petition stands disposed of. 5. Pending application, if any, also stands disposed of. (Ashish Naithani, J) (G. Narendar, CJ) 10.03.2025 10.03.2025 Rathour