Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 31633 (RAJ)

SMT. REKHA SHARMA W/O LATE SHRI DEVENDRA SHARMA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN THROUGH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY

CCP/42/2022 · 2025-09-04

Ganesh Ram Meena

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:35623] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 42/2022 IN S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.1419/2021 Smt. Rekha Sharma W/o Late Shri Devendra Sharma, R/o 155, Radha Govind Colony, Dhear Ke Balaji, Sikar Road, Jaipur. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan Through Principal Secretary, Department Of School And Sanskrit Education, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Naresh Pal Gangwar, Principal Secretary, Department Of School And Sanskrit Education Secretariat Jaipur. 3. Pawan Kumar Goyal, Director, Primary Education, Government Of Rajasthan , Bikaner. ----Contemnor Respondents For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) : Mr. S.S. Naruka, AAG assisted by Mr. Tanishq Aditya Parmar Mr. Jitendra Singh HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 04/09/2025 1. No one has put in appearance on behalf of the petitioner. 2. The present contempt petition has been filed by the petitioner alleging non-compliance of the interim order dated 11.02.2021. 3. The Court vide interim order dated 11.02.2021 ordered for considering the candidature of the petitioner under the widow category. [2025:RJ-JP:35623] (2 of 2) [CCP-42/2022] 4. Learned Additional Advocate General appearing for the respondents/ contemnors submits that in view of the interim order passed by the Court on 11.02.2021, the case of the petitioner was considered by the concerned Department and since the petitioner was not fulfilling the required conditions as has been given in the advertisement dated 31.07.2018, her representation/ application was rejected vide order dated 23.08.2023. 5. Learned Additional Advocate General has placed before this Court the order dated 23.08.2023, which is taken on record. 6. In view of the specific reasons assigned in order dated 23.08.2023, this Court is of the opinion that no contempt of Court is made out. 7. Accordingly, the present contempt petition is dismissed. 8. However, the petitioner would be at liberty to challenge the order dated 23.08.2023 by availing the appropriate remedy available to her under law, if she has any grievance in that regard. 9. Pending application(s) if any also stand disposed of. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J ARTI SHARMA /71