% APHC010463092025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA AT AMARAVATI (Special OriginalJurisdicfion) WEDNESDAY,THE TENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBEl(l= i TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY “ '''' PRESENT the honourable SRI JUSTICE writpetitiom -.^inTnr PRADESH 0^ mI m a FIVE o TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO 2025 Between: Dindi Appala Sai 42B,Telagaveedhi, Denkada Andhra Pradesh-535005. Ram, S/o Dindi Apparao Mandalam, Jonnada Late, R/o D.No.6- Vizianagaram District -PETITIONER AND 1 ■ The State of Andhra Pradesh Department, Secretariat District. Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Buildings, Velagapudi Revenue Amaravati, Guntur 2. The District Collector, 3. The Revenue Divisional District, Andhra Pradesh. 4. The Tahsildar, Vizianagaram District, Vizianagaram District Andhra Pradesh Officer, Denkada Mandal Vizianagaram Jonnada Revenue Andhra Pradesh. Village, Denkada Mandal, ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 circumstances stated i pleased to issue a direction WRIT OF MANDAMUS Respondent in not taking action of the Constitution of India In the affidavit filed therewith praying that in the the High Court may be particularly one in the nature or order, more of declaring the highhanded action of the 4*^^ on my Mutation and Title Deed cum Pattadar passbook application vide application number vide MUT25072401361 3 dated 24.07.2025 even after passing more than 30 days of filing such application before the Respondent Authorities especially 4th Respondent as contrary to law arbitrary, non-Application of mind, discriminatory ,illegal and violative of Article 300-A of Constitution of India and also in provisions enshrined in Andhra Pradesh Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Books Act, 1971 and consequently direct the Respondent No.4 to process my Mutation and Title Deed Cum Pattadar Passbook Application Without any further delay. lA NO: 1 OF 2C)9fi Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 4*^ Respondent to Pattadar Passbook Online Application No vide 24.07.2025 Without petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI MOHAMMAD NAYAB Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 4: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following order: Article 14, Article 21, ■ violation of Section 4 and other process my Mutation and Title Deed Cum MUT250724013613 dated any further delay pending disposal of the main writ RASOOL APHC010463092025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] WEDNESDAY,THE TENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 24183/2025 Between: 1.DINDI APPALA SAI RAM, S/0 DINDI APPARAO LATE R/0 6-42B,TELAGAVEEDHI,DENKADA JONNADA, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH- 535005. D.NO MANDALAM ...PETITIONER AND 1.THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI,AMARAVATI,GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2.THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH 3.THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, DENKADA MANDAL, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 4.THE TAHSILDAR, JONNADA REVENUE VILLAGE , DENKADA MANDAL, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toPleased to issue a direction or order, more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the highhanded action of the 4 Respondent in not taking action on my Mutation and Title Deed cum Pattadar passbook application vide application number vide MUT25072401361 3 dated 24.07.2025 even after passing more than 30 days of filing such application before the Respondent Authorities especially 4th Respondent as contrary to law arbitrary, non-Application of mind, discriminatory ,illegal and violative of Article 14, Article 21, Article 300-A of Constitution of India and also in violation of Section 4 and other provisions enshrined in Andhra Pradesh Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Pleased to direct the 4th Respondent to process my Mutation and Title Deed Cum Pattadar Passbook Online Application No vide MUT250724013613 dated 24.07.2025 Without praying that in the 2 any further delay pending disposal of the main writ petiiton and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. MOHAMMAD NAYAB RASOOL Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR REVENUE r 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.24183 of 2025 ORDER:- Pithily, this writ petition is filed on the ground that application bearing No.MUT250724013613 dated 24.07.2025, was made to the authorities, but it was not addressed. Therefore, it is urged that the respondents be directed to address the application, as such direction would suffice in the circumstances of the case. 2. The Hon’ble Apex Court in The Government of India vs P. Venkatesh^ held as follows: “...Dispose of the representation mantra is increasingly permeating the judicial process in the High Courts and the Tribunals. Such orders may make for a quick or easy disposal of cases in overburdened adjudicatory institutions. But, they do not service to the cause of justice. The litigant is back again before the Court, as this case shows, having incurred attendant costs and suffered delays of the legal process. This would have been obviated by calling for a counter in the first instance, thereby resulting in finality to the dispute...” This Court is not oblivious of the fact that a Court to authorities, before directing "consideration" of a claim or representation should examine whether the claim or representation is with reference to a "live" issue or whether it is with reference to a If it is with reference to a "dead" or Court/tribunal should put an end to the matter and should not direct 3. dead" or "stale" issue. stale" issue or dispute, the (2019) 15 see 613 4 consideration or reconsideration. If the Court to tribunal deciding to direct "consideration" without itself examining the merits, it should make it clear that such consideration will be without prejudice to any contention relating to limitation or delay and laches. Even if the court does not expressly say so, that would be the legal position and effect. 4. Disposal of proceedings by seemingly innocuous orders directing consideration of representation though result in quick or easy disposal of cases in overburdened adjudicatory institutions but such orders do more disservice than service to the cause of justice. 5. However, the respondents are directed that the petitioner’s application bearing No.MUT250724013613 dated 24.07.2025, be considered by examining thoroughly, issue orders accordingly, and communicate the decision to the petitioner. It goes without saying that the entire process will be completed within six (06) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 6. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any shall stand closed. Sd/- K. TATA RAO DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, State of Andhra Pradesh, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District. 2. The District Collector, Vizianagaram District, Andhra Pradesh 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer Denkada Mandal, Vizianagaram District, Andhra Pradesh. 4. The Tahsildar, Jonnada Revenue village, Vizianagaram District, Andhra Pradesh. Denkada Mandal, 5. One CC to Sri Mohammad Nayab Rasool, Advocate [OPUC] 6. Two CCs to GP for Revenue, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] 7. Two CD Copies. ssb HIGH COURT DATED:10/09/2025 ORDER WP No. 24183 OF 2025 * 17 SEP 2075 I ^ . Current section . DISPOSING OF THE W.P. WITHOUT COSTS