APHC010461662025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] MONDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 23640/2025 Between: 1. SHAIK MASTAN VALI,, S/O. KHASIM SAIDA, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/O. ATCHAMPET ROAD, SIVALAYAM STREET SATTENAPALLI TOWN AND MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, GUNTUR DISTRICT AT GUNTUR. 3. THE TAHASILDAR, SATTENAPALLI MANDAL GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. THE SUB REGISTRAR, SATTENAPALLI MANDAL GUNTUR DISTRICT. 5. SHAIK FAJULUN, S/O.MOULALI (LATE), AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS. HOUSE-WIFE, RESIDENT OF DOOR.NO. 18-11-66, JENDA CHETTUR STREET, ATCHAMPET ROAD, SATTENAPALLI TOWN AND MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue Writ order and direction more particular in the nature of mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd and 4th respondents in respect of non consideration of my representation dated 26-08-2025 wherein it was sought to enter the scheduled property into dispute register to prevent multiple litigations in respect of site which is an extent of Ac.48.4 Square yards of tiled house in D.No.120-B1 of Sattenapalli Municipality until up to the disposal of suit vide O.S.No.494/2025 of Principal Civil Judge (Junior Division) Sattenapalli. As the same was not considered with following any 2 procedure is illegal, arbitrary violation of Principles of Natural justice violation of Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of the act and pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 4th respondent i.e., The Sub-registrar, Sattenapalli to consider the representation dated.26.08.2025 before making any registration in respect of schedule property which is an extent of Ac.48.4 Square yards of tiled house in D.No.120-B1 of Sattenapalli Municipality and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. BAGGI VENKATA PAVAN KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO. 23640 of 2025 ORDER: After arguing the matter for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court for withdrawal of this writ petition. Learned counsel endorsed the same on the bundle. Permission is accorded. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date : 08.09.2025 SPP 4 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Writ Petition No:23640 of 2025 Date : 08.09.2025 SPP