APHC010013332023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI FRIDAY THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE y PRESENT HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 557 OF 2023 Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, Aggrieved by the order of the Court of the X Addl. District judge, tirupati, in I.A.No.186 of 2022, in O.S.No.143 of 2014, dated 22.11.2022, the petitioner preferred this Civil Revision Petition Between: Amarapuram Manjunath, S/o A. Krishna Rao, Age 60 years, Occ Business, R/o. D.No. 19-8-210/1, Hathiramji Colony, RC Road, Tirupati District. ...PETITIONER/RESPONDENT N0.1/PLAINTIFF AND 1. Dro Badugu Ramalakshmi, W/o. Dr. Singapati Subbarao, Aged about 52 years, Occ Doctor, R/o. D.No. 18-1-502/BI0, RNR Apartments Road, Tirupati. KT ...Respondent/ Petitioner/Defendant No.6 2. M/S SDN Housing Pvt Ltd, Age . 50 years. Rep. by its Chairman, V.Dasaradha Naidu, S/o. Munaswamy Naidu, R/o. Plot No.I 7, New Balaji Colony, Tirupati. 3. Macharla Lakshmi Ranga Vardhini, W/o. B.V. Subbarao, Aged about 62 years, R/o. D.No.13-1-201/A, Plot No.3, Balaji Swarnapuri Colony, Mothi Nagar, Hyderabad. 4. T Stddeswara Reddy, S/o. T. Chinna Sidda Reddy, Aged about 62 years, R/o. Plot No.66, Vasanth Nagar, Kukatpalli, Hyedarabad City. 5. Kommineni Saroja, W/o. Kommineni Srinivasulu, Aged about 59 years, R/o. D.No.5-69/32, 15t1 Cross, Srikrishna Nagar, MR Palle, Tirupati District. 6. S Ramakrishan Reddy, S/o. S. Bayyapu Reddy, Aged about 65 years, R/o. Plot No. 101, Santhi Apartments Hyderabad City. (Respondents No.2. to 6, are not Necessary parties to this C.R.P.) Bliavya Nagar, Kukatpalli, ...RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS NO 1 TO 5 lA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in O.S.no.143 of2014 on the file of the Court of the X Addl. District Judge, Tirupati Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI G JAGADEESWAR Counsel for the Respondents : The Court made the following ORDER : APHC010013332023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) ■ U0 [3505] FRIDAY,THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 557/2023 Between: Amarapuram Manjunath ...PETITIONER AND Dro Badugu Ramalakshmi and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: ...RESPONDENT(S) 1.G JAGADEESWAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. The Court made the following order: It is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the cause in the revision petition does not survive. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is placed 2. on record. 3. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous application pending, if any, shall stand closed. SD/- K.KASIRAO ACHARI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The X Addl. District Judge, Tirupati 2. One CC to Sri. G Jagadeeswar Advocate [OPUC] 3. The Section Officer, VR Section, High Court of Andhra Pradesh 4. Three CD Copies MKP TAC HIGH COURT DATED:27/06/2025 * 0 6 AUG m ^ , Currem aecuon % ORDER CRP NO. 557 OF 2023 m fi9, CRP IS DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS