KOTHAPALLI NARAYANA MURTHY, W.G. DIST & ANOTHER v. PRL SECY, (LABOUR) MINISTRY OF LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT NEW DELHI
PIL/308/2014 · 2025-06-24
Dhiraj Singh Thakur, Ravi Cheemalapati
Public Interest Litigationbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 31614 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 31614 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
, ■ J APHC010463022014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) /or AjV^ . I. ■>:> >r^'' \ mM * ■ ■‘1 ■k li ■ H WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE <- PRESENT THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO: 308 OF 2014 Between:
1. Kothapalli Narayana Murthy, S/o D. Venkata Ramaiah Aged about 55 years, Occ: Social Worker, R/o 4-143-5 (A), Weakers Colony Near Govtl Primary Health Center Tadepalligudem, west Godavari District Andhra Pradesh-534 101. 2. Dudala Srinivasa Rao, S/o Kesava Rao Aged about 45 years, Occ: Social Worker R/o 4-103-18, Pasupathi Nagar, Tadepalligudem, West Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh. ...Petitioners AND
1. The Union of India, Rep. by Principal Secretary (Labour), Ministry of Labour and Employment New Delhi. 2. The National Council for Vocational training (NCVT), Department of Industrial Training, Ministry of Labour, Government of India, New Delhi. 3. The Quality Council of India, Institution of Engineers Building 2nd Floor, 2nd Bahadur Shah Jaffar Marg New Delhi. ...Respondents
3 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the respondents 1 and 2 in entrusting the work of accreditation and affiliation of Government and Private Ill's Institutions to the 3rd respondent is arbitrary and illegal and further declare that the 3rd respondent a private body cannot discharge a Governmental functions and direct the respondents 1 and 2 to continue the supervision and control of Government ITI and Private ITI Institutes without reference to the discretion and decision of the 3rd respondent. lA NO: 1 OF 2014(PILMP 456 OF 2014) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the respondents 1 and 2 to continue the supervision and control of the Private ITI Institutions without reference to the 3rd respondent, pending disposal of the above Writ Petition.
Counsel for the Petitioners: M/S. VIJAYALAKSHMI PALADUGU Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 & 2: SRI PASALA PONNA RAO (DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA) Counsel for the Respondent No.3; SRI P RAMACHANDRAN The Court made the following order:
APHC010463022014 Bench Sr.No:-38 [3483] IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO: 308 of 2014 Kothapalli Narayana Murthy & Another ...Petitioners Vs. PrI. Secy. Ministry of Labour Employment, New Delhi and Others ...Respondents -k-kifk-kifk-kic-M Advocate for Petitioners; None Advocates for Respondents: Mr. Pasala Ponna Rao (Deputy Solicitor General of India), Mr. P. Ramachandran
CORAM :THE CHIEF JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI : 25^'’ June, 2025. DATE P C : None for the petitioners. It appears that the petitioners have interest lost interest in the matter. The present petition is accordingly dismissed for non-prosecution. No
order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, in this petition, shall stand closed.
Sd/- G. HELA NAIDU ASSISTANT REGISTRY //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1 One CC to M/s. Vijayalakshmi Paladugu Advocate [OPUC]
2. One CC to Sri Pasala Ponna Rao High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OPUC] CC to Sri P Ramachandran, Advocate [OPUC]
4. Two CD Copies Deputy Solicitor General of India,
3. One TF
^ - HIGH COURT DATED:25/06/2025
ORDER PIL NO. 308 OF 2014 2 3 JUL 2025 Sectiopx^^ o o» DISMISSING THE W.P. FOR NON-PROSECUTION, WITHOUT COSTS