1 APHC010461972025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 9279/2025 Between: 1. KANDUKURI VENKATA SUBBA RAYUDU, S/O SUBBA RAYUDU, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS,OCC BUSINESS, R/O 1-342, NEAR SAI BABA TEMPLE, PAPARAJU THOTA,CHIRALA, BAPATLA DISTRICT, A.P. ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF A.P. AT AMARAVATHI, 2. SWARNA LAKSHMI NARAYANA, S/O RAMAKRISHNAIAH, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, C/O BARBER SHOP, CHIRALA. BAPATLA DISTRICT, A.P. ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner/accused: 1. PHANI KIRAN.M Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR 2 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 9279 of 2025 ORDER: The instant criminal petition under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘BNSS’) has been filed by the Petitioner/Accused, seeking to quash the order dated 17.07.2025 passed by the Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class-cum-Additional Junior Civil Judge, Chirala, in Crl.M.P.No.340 of 2025 in C.C.No.517 of 2015. 2. Heard Sri Phani Kiran, learned counsel for the Petitioner/Accused and Ms. K.Priyanka Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor on behalf of the State. 3. The petitioner herein filed petition under Section 45 of the Evidence Act seeking to send the cheque and pronote to the Forensic Science Laboratory, DGP Office Mangalagiri in order to determine signature and the contemporary writing of the accused on the promissory note, on which, by an order dated 17.07.2025, the learned Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Chirala, dismissed the said petition. Against which, the present Criminal Petition has been preferred. 4. On hearing learned counsel on both sides and on perusal of the material on record, there are no grounds to interfere in the impugned order. 5. Therefore, the Criminal Petition is dismissed. However, the learned trial Judge is directed to dispose of the case as expeditiously as possible without 3 granting further adjournments in a casual manner upon mere asking. The petitioner is at liberty to raise all his points before the trial Judge and the learned trial Judge may appreciate the same and take appropriate decision over the matter according to governing Rules and Law. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 09.09.2025 ASR 4 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 9279 of 2025 Dated.09.09.2025 Asr