APHC010461872025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH ATAMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) vN m isi - I : ill r .'■h MONDAY,THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 24504 OF 2025 Between: 1. C. Anjani Devi, W/o C. Ashok Kumar Reddy, Aged about 40 Years Occ- Hou.se wife. R/o D.No. 12/1/573, Ashok Nagar, 3rd Ananthapuramu town, Ananthapuramu District. cross. 2. C. Rami Reddy, S/o. C. Ramachandra Reddy, Chowtapalli Post, Kondapur Mandal, Kadapa D.No.l/82-A, Muchumarri village District. 3. C. Nagesh Kumar, S/o. C. Subbaiah Setty Street, Anathapuam town, Ananthapuamu District. D.No. 21/226, Brahmin ...PETITIONERS AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Principal Secretary Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District. Revenue 2. The Joint Collector, Anathapuramu, Ananthapuramu District. 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer and SubDivisional Magistrate Ananthapuramu, Ananthapuramu District. 4. The Tahsildar, Anathapuramu Rural Mandal, Ananthapuramu District. 5. K. Lokesh Reddy, S/o k. Yella Reddy age not known, R/o. D.NO. 19- 254-96 Rani Nagar, Anathapuramu District. 6. L. Varalakshmi, W/o. L. Adinarayana Reddy, Age not known, R/o. D.NO.59/877, Kurnool District. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2"^^ respondent in not disposing the Revision petition dt.28.06.2025 filed by the petitioners against the orders dt.31.05.2025 passed by the 3'^'^ respondent vide Proceedings in Rc.No.D2(B)/945/2024, cancelling for Sub-Division in Sy.No.151-2 total extent of 6.60 Acres is illegal, arbitrary and unjust and violation of the principles of natural justice and consequently direct the 2 dispose the revision filed by the petitioners dt.28.06.2025. lA NO: 1 OF 2Q2fi Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 4*^ respondent not to proceed further on the order dt.31.05.2025 passed by the 3'"^ respondent till the disposal of the revision pending before the 2^^ respondent, pending disposal of the writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI G. SRINIVASULA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 4: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent Nos.5 & 6:— The Court made the following order: nd respondent to APHC010461872025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE [3330] MM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 24504/2025 Between: 1.C. ANJANI DEVI, W/0 C- ASHOK KUMAR REDDY, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, OCC- HOU.SE WIFE, R/0 D.NO. 12/1/573, ASHOK NAGAR, 3RD CROSS, ANANTHAPURAMU TOWN, ANANTHAPURAMU DISTRICT. 2.C. RAMI REDDY, S/0. C. RAMACHANDRA REDDY, D.NO.L/82-A, MUCHUMARRI VILLAGE, CHOWTAPALLI POST, KONDAPUR MANDAL, KADAPA DISTRICT. 3.C. NAGESH KUMAR, S/0. C. SUBBAIAH SETTY, D.NO. 21/226, BRAHMIN STREET, ANATHAPUAM TOWN, ANANTHAPUAMU DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2.THE JOINT COLLECTOR, ANATHAPURAMU, ANANTHAPURAMU DISTRICT. 3.THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER AND SUBDIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE, ANANTHAPURAMU, ANANTHAPURAMU DISTRICT. 4.THE TAHSILDAR, ANATHAPURAMU RURAL MANDAL, ANANTHAPURAMU DISTRICT. 5.K LOKESH REDDY, S/0 K. YELLA REDDY, AGE NOT KNOWN, R/0. D.N0.19-254-96 RANI NAGAR, ANATHAPURAMU DISTRICT. 6.L VARALAKSHMI, W/0. L. ADINARAYANA REDDY, AQE NOT KNOWN, R/0. D.NO.59/877, KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of Indig praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more / particularly one in nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of in not disposing the Revision petition dt.28.06.2025 filed by the petitioners against the orders dt 31 05 2025 respondent vide Proceedings in Rc.No.D2(B)/945/2024, cancelling for Sub-Division in Sy.No.151-2 total extent of 6.60 Acres is illegal, arbitrary and unjust and violation of the principles of natural justice and consequently direct the 2nd Hf9«°nATnoc° by the petitioners dt.28.06.2025 and to pass lA NO: 1 OF 2n?.q Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court A 4threspondent not to proceed further on the order dt.31.05.2025 passed by the 3'^^ respondent till the disposal of the revision pending before the 2nd respondent, pending disposal the writ petition and to pass y m of Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1.G SRINIVASULA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO. 24504 of 2025 ORDER: The present Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief: “...to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2"^ respondent in not disposing the Revision petition dt.2B.0Q.2025 filed by the petitioners against the ordprs dt. 31.05.2025 passed by the 3'"^respondent vide Proceedings in Rc.No.02(B)/945/2024, cancelling for Sub-Division in Sy.No.151-2 total extent of 5.60 Acres is illegal, arbitrary and unjust and violation of the principles of natural justice and consequently direct the 2'^^ respondent to dispose the revision filed by the petitioners dt.28.06.2025 and pass such other order or orders as this Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case”. 2. The petitioners have approached this Court with a prayer for issuance of a direction for expeditious disposal of the Revision Petition, dated 28.06.2025 filed by the petitioners against the orders vide Rc.No.D2(B)/945/2024 dated 31.05.2025 passed by the 3^^ respondent for cancellation of Sub-Division in Sy.No.151-2 total extent of Ac.6.60 cents. The learned counsel for the petitioners stated that the appellate authority is bound to decide the case in accordance with law expeditiously. The urgency that is stated that the property rights are involved in the case if the delay is occasioned that it will be detrimental to the petitioners. Hence, pleaded to direct the revisional authority to dispose of the revision in a time bound manner in accordance with law. 3. 4 Ergo the Court directs the 2""^ respondent appellate authority to make an endeavour by making all the efforts with due diligence for disposal of the interlocutory application in Revision Petition, dated 28.06.2025 filed by the petitioners, as per law, as expeditiously as possible and in any case, within four weeks from the date of receipt of 4. the order. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no 5. order as to costs. As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. Sd/-T.SR1NIVASA RAO ASSISTANT^GISTRAR H //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, State of Andhra Pradesh, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District. 2. The Joint Collector, Anathapuramu, Ananthapuramu District. 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer and Sub Divisional Magistrate, Ananthapuramu, Ananthapuramu District. 4. The Tahsildar, Anathapuramu Rural Mandal, Ananthapuramu District. 5. One CC to Sri G. Srinivasula Reddy, Advocate [OPUC] 6. Two CCs to GP for Revenue, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] 7. Two CD Copies. ssb I HIGH COURT DATED:15/09/2025 ORDER WP No. 24504 OF 2025 5 ?5 SfP 2025 - ^ Current Section N5^spatc\'^ mt DISPOSING OF THE W.P. WITHOUT COSTS