1 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CR No. 188 of 2025 1 - Icici Lombard General Insurance Company Limited Registered Office At Icici Lombard House, 414, Veer Savarkar Marg, Near Siddhi Vinayak Temple Prabhadevi Mumbai Mh Thro. Legal Manager Deepak Soni Aged 33 Yers. S/o Late M.L. Soni Icici Lombard General Insurance Co. Ltd. 5th Floor Sky Park, In Front Of Bhatiya Hospital Civil Lines Raipur (C.G.) Applicant / Insurer) ... Applicant(s) versus 1 - Sukhsai Nag S/o Bade Jeetan Aged About 53 Years Caste Nagavanshi R/o Village Ludeg (Navapara), Police Station Pathalgaon, District - Jashpur (C.G.). 2 - Rupesh Nag S/o Bade Jeetan Aged About 21 Years Caste Nagavanshi R/o Village Ludeg (Navapara), Police Station Pathalgaon, District - Jashpur (C.G.). 3 - Minor Rupabai D/o Sukhsai Aged About 16 Years Through Natural Guardian Father Sukhsai Nag S/o Bade Jeetan Age 53 Years, Caste RAGHVENDRA JAT Digitally signed by RAGHVENDRA JAT 2 Nagavanshi R/o Village Ludeg (Navapara), Police Station Pathalgaon, District - Jashpur (C.G.) (Claimants). 4 - Nitesh Trikey S/o Late Balaram Aged About 21 Years R/o Village Ludeg (Barpani), Police Station Pathalgaon, District - Jashpur (C.G.). 5 - Rakesh Tirkey S/o Late Balaram Aged About 30 Years 2 R/o Village Ludeg (Barpani), Police Station Pathalgaon, District - Jashpur (C.G.) Respondent / Driver – Owner. ... Respondent(s) For Applicant(s) : Mr. Raja Sharma, Advocate. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 08/04/2026 1. By way of this revision petition, the applicant has prayed for following reliefs:- “It is, therefore, prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow the instant revision with consequential relief and quash the impugned order dated 09/05/2025 passed by the learned MACT Pathalgaon, Distt. Jashpur in Claim Case No. 12/2023, with consequential relief rejecting entire claim petition /application being filed beyond statutory period of six months from the date of accident as not maintainable, in the interest of justice.” 2. Learned counsel for the applicant after arguing for some time seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this revision petition. 3 3. Accordingly, the revision petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Raghu Jat