Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 31599 (BOM)

THE BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED THROUGH THE BRANCH OFFICER v. KEVALKRUSHNA ATMARAM PATIL AND OTEHRS

CA/12157/2024 · 2025-01-23

Shri S G Chapalgaonkar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 59 delay.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 59 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 12157 OF 2024 IN FAST/30838/2024 THE BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED THROUGH THE BRANCH OFFICER VERSUS KEVALKRUSHNA ATMARAM PATIL AND OTHERS ... Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Deshmukh Mohit Rameshrao ... CORAM : S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J. Dated : January 23, 2025 PER COURT :- 1. Heard Mr. Deshmukh, learned Advocate appearing for the applicant. 2. The applicant seeks to condone the delay of 75 days caused in filing of the appeal. 3. Although the notice of this application is served upon respondents, none appears. 4. Having considered the reasons as stated in the application, delay is occasioned on account of administrative reasons. The applicant has not derived any advantage by making delay. Consequently, the sufficient cause is made out. Hence, application is allowed. Delay of 75 days in filing appeal, is condoned. Appeal be registered. ( S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR ) JUDGE spc-