DEEPAK SINGH S/O LATE SHRI GIRDHARI SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/16880/2024 · 2025-01-28
Mahendar Kumar Goyal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 31597 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 31597 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:3856] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16880/2024 Deepak Singh S/o Late Shri Girdhari Singh, Aged About 27 Years, Resident Of Village Tatera, Tehsil Shrimadhopur, District Sikar (Raj.). ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Additional Chief Secretary, Department Of Mines And Geology, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. Director (Mines), Directorate Of Mines And Geology Department, Khanij Bhawan, Shashtri Circle, Udaipur, Rajasthan.
3. Superintending Mining Engineer, Department Of Mines And Geology, Jaipur Circle, Jaipur, 5Th Floor, Khanij Bhawan, Tilak Marg, C- Scheme, Jaipur-302005.
4. Mining Engineer, Department Of Mines And Geology, Jhunjhunu. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shashwat Purohit For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL
Judgment / Order 28/01/2025 This writ petition is filed assailing the legality and validity of the order impugned dated 23.08.2024.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the aforesaid
order has been passed pursuant to the office order dated 27.02.2020 Clause 4 whereof, provides to the aggrieved person a remedy to submit a representation with the concerned Superintending Mining Engineer. He submits that despite
[2025:RJ-JP:3856] (2 of 2) [CW-16880/2024] submission of such representation by him way back on 20.09.2024, the same is yet to be decided. Eschewing merits of the case, learned counsel for the petitioner prays that the respondents be directed to take a conscious decision upon his representation expeditiously. Taking into consideration the limited prayer made by the
learned counsel for the petitioner and provisions contained in the office order dated 27.02.2020, this writ petition is disposed of in following term(s) without issuing notices to the respondents to obviate further delay:-
1. The respondent No.3 is directed to decide the representation dated 20.09.2024 filed by the petitioner against the order impugned dated 23.08.2024 by a reasoned and speaking order within a period of two weeks from the date of communication of this order. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of.
(MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J Manish/20