Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 31593 (ALL)

PAPPU v. STATE OF U.P.

BAIL/35068/2021 · 2025-01-24

Samit Gopal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:12980 Court No. - 78 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 35068 of 2021 Applicant :- Pappu Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Kunwar Janmejay Pratap Singh,Madan Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Mohit Singh Hon'ble Samit Gopal,J. 1. List revised. 2. No one appears on behalf of the applicant to press this bail application despite the fact that there are two learned counsels appearing in the matter. Sri Mohit Singh, learned counsel for the first informant is not present even when the matter is taken in the revised list. Sri V.D. Ojha, learned counsel for the State is present. 3. This is second bail application of the applicant. The first bail application of the applicant was rejected by this Court vide order dated 20.01.2021 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 2356 of 2021 (Pappu vs. State of U.P.). 4. The present matter is of the year 2020. It is more than four years since then. It appears that learned counsel for the parties are not interested in pursuing the matter as or the matter has rendered infructuous by efflux of time. 5. Despite the matter being taken up in the revised list, there is no representation from either of the sides. 6. In view of the above, the present bail application is dismissed for want of prosecution. Order Date :- 24.1.2025 AS Rathore (Samit Gopal,J.) Digitally signed by :- ABHISHEK SINGH RATHOR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad