Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:24830 CRL.P No. 11011 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE J.M.KHAZI CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 11011 OF 2022 (482(Cr.PC) / 528(BNSS)) BETWEEN:
S LOKESH S/O B N SHANTHARAJ AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS NO.24/30, 4TH C CROSS, ANJANEYANAGAR BANASHANKARI III STAGE, III PHASE BANGALORE -560 085 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. VASUDEVA IYENGAR K T, ADVOCATE-ABSENT) AND:
SMT T P KUSUMA W/O LATE M SESHIDHAR AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS NO.978, 7TH CROSS BANASHANKARI I STAGE 2ND BLOCK, BANGALORE -560050 …RESPONDENT (NIL)
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.397 R/W 401 CR.P.C BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE
ORDER DATED 15.09.2022 PASSED BY THE HONBLE JUDGE AND ACMM AND COURT OF SMALL CAUSES (SCCH-8) BANGALORE.
Digitally signed by REKHA R Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:24830 CRL.P No. 11011 of 2022
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE J.M.KHAZI
ORAL ORDER
No representation for petitioner.
No representation for petitioner even in the afternoon session.
This matter is of the year 2022.
Vide order dated 27.06.2025, a conditional order was passed to the effect that if office objections are not complied with, necessary orders would be passed for dismissal of the petition.
Despite the same, office objections are not complied with. It appears petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition.
Hence, petition is dismissed for default. Sd/- (J.M.KHAZI) JUDGE RR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 4