1 2025:CGHC:33176-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPCR No. 399 of 2025 Anil Kumar S/o Shiv Bahoran Aged About 37 Years R/o Barampur Khadgawan District M.C.B. (Chhattisgarh), (Complainant) ... Petitioner versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh, through its Secretary Department of Home Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan Naya Raipur Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 2 - Superintendent of Police M.C.B. Distt- M.C.B.(C.G.) 3 - The Station House Officer Police Khadgawa, Raipur, District M.C.B. (C.G.) 4 - Smt. Mamta Sharma W/o Shri Sanjay Sharma Resident of 33/34 Bajaj Colony New Rejendra Nagar Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh, (Accused) 5 - Sanjay Sharma Resident of 33/34 Bajaj Colony New Rejendra Nagar Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Ajay Chandra, Advocate For Respondents/State : Mr. Sangharsh Pandey, Govt. Advocate Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru , Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha, C.J. 16.07.2025 1. Heard Mr. Ajay Chandra, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. Sangharsh Pandey, learned Government Advocate, appearing for the State/respondent Nos. 1 to 3 and perused the ROHIT KUMAR CHANDRA Digitally signed by ROHIT KUMAR CHANDRA 2 prayers and pleadings made in the writ petition. 2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking following reliefs :- “(i) That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue an appropriate writ by directing the respondent no. 1 to 3 to immediate further take action for arresting the accused in connection of respondents no. 4 & 5 grievous offence under section 420, 294, 506, 34 of I.P.C. registered FIR No. 12/2025, in the interest of justice. (ii) That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue additional direction to the respondent authorities to recover two vehicle of the petitioner from the accused respondents no. 4 & 5 with interest in the interest of justice. (iii) Any other relief which may be suitable in the facts and circumstances of the case, may also be granted.” 3. Considering the prayers and pleadings made in the writ petition, the same is wholly misconceived, as such, we do not find any good ground to issue any direction for arresting the accused- respondent Nos. 4 and 5. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. However, the petitioner is at liberty to take appropriate steps for redressal of his grievance, in accordance with law. Sd/- Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Chandra