HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD ARBITRATION AND CONCILI. APPL.U/S11(4) No. - 117 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE PIYUSH AGRAWAL, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned counsel for the opposite party(s). 2. The office has placed on record the consent given by Dr. Justice Satish Chandra, Former Judge of High Court, Allahabad, whose name was proposed to act as an Arbitrator under Section 11 (8) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, vide order dated 12.02.2026. 3. Accordingly, Dr. Justice Satish Chandra, Former Judge of High Court, Allahabad, R/o D-25, Brahama Apartments, Sector-7, Dwarka, New Delhi (Mob. No. 9599587418) is hereby appointed as an Arbitrator, who shall adjudicate the matter and settle all the dispute between the parties in accordance with law. 4. The Arbitrator shall be entitled to his fees and expenses in accordance with the fourth Schedule to the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996. 5. In view of the above, the present arbitration application stands allowed. 6. Office to intimate this order to the Arbitrator. 7. This Court vide order dated 12.02.2026 has directed that subject to his consent under Section 11(8) of the Act, the parties agree to request the learned arbitrator to conduct the proceedings at Prayagraj. It has been informed at Bar that the proceedings should have been conducted at Delhi Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ram Awtar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : A.S.G.I., Himkanya Srivastava M/S Chhonkar Associates Mathura .....Applicant(s) Union Of India And Another .....Opposite Party(s) NCR, instead of Prayagraj. 8. In view of the above, it is provided that instead of Prayagraj as mentioned in the order dated 12.02.2026, "Delhi NCR" be read over and transcribed. May 5, 2026 Amit Mishra ARCO No. 117 of 2025 2 (Piyush Agrawal,J.) Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR MISHRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad