Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 31577 (JHR)

RAJENDRA KUMAR SINGH v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

WPC/2575/2025 · 2025-06-18

Deepak Roshan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:15960 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S). No. 2575 of 2025 ---------- 1. Rajendra Kumar Singh, s/o. Arjun Singh, aged about 56 years, resident of Mahtha Garden Gali, P.O. & P.S. Giridih, Dist. Giridih. 2. Shyam Sundar Prasad Singh, s/o. Lakshmi Prasad Singh, aged about 59 years, resident of Tund Munda Krishna Nagar, P.O. & P.S. Giridih, Dist. Giridih. 3. Md. Niyaz Ahmad, s/o. Md. Kalim Ahmad, aged about 56 years, resident of Bhandaridih, P.O. & P.S. Giridih, Dist. Giridih. 4. Arjun Pandey, S/o. Govind Pandey, aged about 56 years, resident of village Mahesh Tundi, P.O. Kaharwar, P.S. Giridih Mufassil, Dist. Giridih. 5. Anil Kumar Rai, s/o. Shakti Ray, aged about 56 years, resident of near Circus Maidan, New Barganda, P.O. & P.S. Giridih, Dist. Giridih. …. Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand. 2. The Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Government of Jharkhand, Project Building, Dhurwa, P.O. & P.S. Dhurwa, Dist. Ranchi. 3. The Director, Primary Education, Human Resources Development Department, Government of Jharkhand, Project Building, Dhurwa, P.O. & P.S. Dhurwa, Dist. Ranchi. 4. The Deputy Commissioner, Giridih, P.O. & P.S. Giridih, Dist. Giridih. 5. The District Superintendent of Education, Giridih, P.O. & P.S. Giridih, Dist. Giridih. ………. Respondents. ---------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN ----------- For the Petitioners : Mr. Lakhan Chandra Roy, Advocate For the State : Mr. Suresh Kumar, SC (L&C)-II Mr. Anshuman Kumar, AC to SC(L&C)-II ---------- 06/ 18.06.2025 In the instant writ application prayer has been made for direction upon the respondent to promote the petitioners in Grade-IV and Grade-VII scale and pay consequential benefits. 2. Learned counsel for the respondents refers to para-9 of the counter- affidavit and submits that the respondents have completed the entire process for publication of the promotion list under different Grades in the district of Giridih, in which the names of petitioners are also present. 2025:JHHC:15960 2 3. In view of fair submission of learned counsel for the respondent-State and averment made in para-9 of the counter-affidavit, the instant writ application stands disposed of. 4. It is expected that the consequential benefits shall be extended to the petitioners in accordance with law and applicable rules and regulations. (Deepak Roshan, J.) kunal/-