Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 31571 (RAJ)

SMT. RENU W/O SHRI RAM CHANDER v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

HC/357/2025 · 2025-10-03

Avneesh Jhingan, Baljinder Singh Sandhu

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:40129-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Habeas Corpus Petition No. 357/2025 Smt. Renu W/o Shri Ram Chander, Aged About 34 Years, Currently Residing At Fatak 77 Neem Ka Thana, District Sikar, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Home Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Superintendent Of Police, District Sikar, Rajasthan. 3. Station House Officer, Police Station Neem Ka Than, District Sikar Rajasthan. 4. Mahendra Meena, R/o Neem K Thana, District Sikar, Rajasthan 5. Ankit, R/o Neem A Ka Thana, District Sikar, Rajasthan 6. Vinod Kumawat, R/o Neem Ka Thana, District Sikar Rajasthan 7. Addl. Director General Of Police, Anti Human Trafficking Unit, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rishabh Tayal with Ms. Muskan Jangid through VC For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sudesh Saini, AGA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BALJINDER SINGH SANDHU Order 03/10/2025 1. This petition in the nature of Habeas Corpus is filed by the petitioner–mother for production of Bhavika daughter of the petitioner (hereinafter referred to as ‘detenue’). 2. The detenue was missing since 10.07.2025 and an FIR was registered on 11.07.2025 at Neem Ka Thana Police Station, Sikar. [2025:RJ-JP:40129-DB] (2 of 2) [HC-357/2025] The grievance raised is that the required action is not being taken by the Police. 3. It is not the case of the petitioner that the detenue is in illegal custody. This petition is disposed of with the direction that the Superintendent of Police concerned shall monitor the proceedings on fortnightly basis and the police shall submit the monthly report to the Superintendent of Police till the detenue is traced. 4. In case the petitioner, if dissatisfied would be at liberty to approach the Magistrate for supervising of the investigation. 5. In the eventuality of the application being made, the Court concerned shall consider the same in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible in the facts of the case. (BALJINDER SINGH SANDHU),J (AVNEESH JHINGAN),J DANISH USMANI /168