[2025:RJ-JP:29326] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17302/2023 Rampal Kumawat Son Of Shri Bhiwaram Kumawat, Aged About 57 Years, R/o 48, Bhomiya Nagar, Kalwar Road, Jhotwara, Jaipur (Rajasthan) ----Petitioner Versus 1. Gajendra Singh S/o Shri Narayan Singh, R/o 122, Rajpooton Ka Mohalla, Durgapura, (Ward No.25) Jaipur Through Power Of Attorney Holder Shri Omprakash Yadav S/o Shri Birbal Yadav, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Dhani Sunarawali, Khelna, Tehsil Pavta, District Jaipur (Rajasthan) 2. Bhairav Grah Nirman Sahkari Samiti Limited, Jaipur, Registration No. 3122/l Through Its Secretary Mali Ram Raigar, 197, Subhash Colony, Shastri Nagar, Jaipur. 3. Jaipur Development Authority, Through Deputy Commissioner, Prithvi Raj Nagar Zone North (First), Chitrakoot Stadium, Vaishali Nagar, Jaipur. 4. Sole Arbitrator And Deputy Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Room No.608, 5Th Floor, Mini Secretariat, Banipark, Jaipur. ----Respondents Connected With S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16681/2023 Rampal Kumawat Son Of Shri Bhiwaram Kumawat, Aged About 57 Years, R/o 48, Bhomiya Nagar, Kalwar Road, Jhotwara, Jaipur (Rajasthan) ----Petitioner Versus 1. Smt. Manju Kanwar W/o Shri Lal Singh Bhati, R/o Gali No.2, Oppe, Bhati Market, Nayapura Mandor, Jodhpur Through Power Of Attorney Holder Shri Omprakash Yadav S/o Shri Birbal Yadav, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Dhani Sunarawali, Khelna, Tehsil Pavta, District Jaipur (Rajasthan) 2. Bhairav Grah Nirman Sahkari Samiti Limited, Jaipur, [2025:RJ-JP:29326] (2 of 4) [CW-17302/2023] Registration No. 3122/l Through Its Secretary Mali Ram Raigar, 197, Subhash Colony, Shastri Nagar, Jaipur. 3. Jaipur Development Authority, Through Deputy Commissioner, Prithvi Raj Nagar Zone North (First), Chitrakoot Stadium, Vaishali Nagar, Jaipur. 4. Sole Arbitrator And Deputy Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Room No.608, 5Th Floor, Mini Secretariat, Banipark, Jaipur. ----Respondents S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16687/2023 1. Himanshu Sharma S/o Shri Deendayal Sharma, Aged About 21 Years, Resident Of A-135, Kardhani Yojna, Kalwar Road, Govindpura, Jaipur. 2. Deendayal Sharma S/o Shri Mahaveer Prasad Sharma, Aged About 48 Years, Resident Of A-135, Kardhani Yojna, Kalwar Road, Govindpura, Jaipur. ----Petitioners Versus 1. Bhagirath Singh Rajawat S/o Shri Raj Singh Rajawat, R/o C-69A, Chhatrasal Nagar, Malviya Nagar, Jaipur Through Power Of Attorney Holder Shri Omprakash Yadav S/o Shri Birbal Yadav, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Dhani Sunarawali, Khelna, Tehsil Pavta, District Jaipur (Rajasthan) 2. Bhairav Grah Nirman Sahkari Samiti Limited, Jaipur, Registration No. 3122/l Through Its Secretary Mali Ram Raigar, 197, Subhash Colony, Shastri Nagar, Jaipur. 3. Jaipur Development Authority, Through Deputy Commissioner, Prithvi Raj Nagar Zone North (First), Chitrakoot Stadium, Vaishali Nagar, Jaipur. 4. Sole Arbitrator And Deputy Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Room No.608, 5Th Floor, Mini Secretariat, Banipark, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sandeep Pathak Mr. Arnav Singh For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Kuri [2025:RJ-JP:29326] (3 of 4) [CW-17302/2023] JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 31/07/2025 1. Since these writ petitions involved common questions of law and facts, therefore, with consent of counsel for the parties, arguments have been heard together in all these matters and the same are being decided by this common order. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are the original allottees of the subject land but their allotment was assailed by the other side, hence, the main matter reached before the Arbitrator, who passed an order in favour of the petitioners and the allottment made in favour of the petitioners were found to be valid vide award dated 30.01.2023. Counsel submits that the aforesaid award passed by the Arbitrator was assailed by the respondents before the Cooperative Tribunal, who quashed and set-aside the award passed by the Tribunal vide impugned order dated 22.09.2023, against which these writ petitions have been preferred before this Court. Counsel submits that during the pendency of these writ petitions, now the parties have amicably settled their dispute by entering into a compromise and it has been agreed between the parties that the respondents would not claim any right, title and interest over the subject land and they have no objection if the impugned order dated 22.09.2023 passed by the Cooperative Tribunal be quashed and set-aside. 3. The parties have put in appearance in person and they have duly identified by their respective counsel. [2025:RJ-JP:29326] (4 of 4) [CW-17302/2023] 4. Considering the aforesaid arguments raised by counsel for the both the sides and looking to the fact that parties have amicably settled their dispute by entering into a compromise/settlement, these writ petitions stand allowed in terms and conditions of the compromise and accordingly, the impugned order dated 22.09.2023 passed by the Cooperative Tribunal stands quashed and set-aside. 5. The compromise is ordered to be taken on record. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Ashu/280, 283, 284