APHC010461652025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] WEDNESDAY,THE TENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO I.A.Nos.2 & 3 of 2025 In/and CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 982/2025 Between: 1.NEELAM SRINIVASA RAO, S/O RAMA CHANDRA RAO, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, R/O,D/NO.5-171, NEAR PRIMARY SCHOOL OF MANDALAPARRU GANAPAVARAM MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, A.P HIGH COURT BUILDING, AMARAVATHI. 2.KANUMALLI MURALI KRISHNA, S/O SURYA PRAKASHA RAO, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS R/O D/NO,2-110, VINAYAKA TEMPLE STREET, K. ILINDRAPARRU VILLAGE, IRAGAVARAM MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.VARDHINEEDI SAI KIRAN Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following: 2 ORDER: Petitioner and Respondent No.2 are present. 2. Two applications, I.A.Nos.2 & 3, are filed, one is for permission to compromise the case, and the other one is for compounding the offence. 3. Both parties have filed joint memo and also the affidavits signed by both parties along with their respective counsel. 4. The Petitioner and Respondent No.2 have compromised their case before the elders. An amount of Rs.16,00,000/- has been paid by the Petitioner to Respondent No.2. 5. Since the Petitioner and Respondent No.2 have settled their case, permission is accorded to compromise the matter under Section 147 of ‘the N.I. Act’ read with Section 320(6) of ‘the Cr.P.C.’ 6. In the result, the I.A.Nos.2 & 3 are allowed, and the Criminal Revision Case is disposed of as compromise, the Petitioner is acquitted under Section 320(8) of ‘the Cr.P.C.’ The judgment dated 15.07.2025 in Crl.A.No.33/2025 on the file of the learned IV Additional District & Sessions Judge, Tanuku; the judgment in C.C.No.91/2021 dated21.02.2025 on the file of the Principal Civil Judge (Junior Division)-cum-Judicial Magistrate of First Class Court, Tanuku are set aside, the Petitioner is acquitted. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ DR. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Date: 10.09.2025 VTS