APHC010454262015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] TUESDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 5383/2015 Between: 1. KOMMINENI LAKSHMI NARAYANA,, S/O. PEDDA MATTAIAH, AGED 32-YEARS, OCC: PRIVATE SERVICE, R/O. PULIPADU VILLAGE, GURAZALA MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE REGIONAL PASSPORT OFFICER, Hyderabad, Door No.8-2-215 to 219, Kummaraguda, Secunderabad-500 003 Telangana State ...RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of 'Writ of Mandamus' declaring the action of the Respondent insisting to produce the Court order as to permit the Petitioner to travel abroad and undertaking by the Petitioner for renewal of passport bearing No.HY2077908416314 as illegal, arbitrary and in flagrant violation of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and also in gross violation of provisions of Passport Act, 1967 and consequently set aside the letter issued by the Respondent vide Ref.No.0BJ/302372583/15, dated 12.02.2015 and further direct the Respondent to renew the passport application Number- HY207790841614 of the Petitioner IA NO: 1 OF 2015(WPMP 7168 OF 2015 2 JS,J W.P.No.5383/2015 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to issue an interim order directing the Respondent to renew the passport application Number-HY207790841614 of the Petitioner forthwith, pending disposal of the Writ Petition Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. VENKATA RAMA RAO KOTA Counsel for the Respondent: 1. DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA The Court made the following 3 JS,J W.P.No.5383/2015 ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication. Recording the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 12.08.2025 KAS