Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 31551 (ALL)

PINKI v. STATE OF U.P.

NA529/584/2025 · 2025-04-23

Nalin Kumar Srivastava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:62871 Court No. - 80 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 584 of 2025 Applicant :- Pinki Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Monika Pal Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Nalin Kumar Srivastava,J. 1. This application under Section 529 Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (hereinafter referred to as B.N.S.S.) has been filed with a prayer to direct the trial court to decide the Final Report No. 33 of 2024 arising out of Case Crime No. 420 of 2023 (Pinki Vs. Rohit), under Sections 302, 201 I.P.C., Police Station Ajeetmal, District Auraiya, expeditiously within a stipulated period. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. for the State. 3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is informant in Case Crime No.420 of 2023 (Pinki Vs. Rohi), under Sections 302, 201 I.P.C., Police Station Ajeetmal, District Auraiya wherein final report was submitted on 20.01.2024. It is further submitted that the applicant/informant does not want to proceed any further against the final report submitted in the court but instead of passing an order, only dates are being fixed by the trial court. 4. Learned AGA opposed the prayer. 5. I have considered the submissions and perused the record. 6. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the trial court is directed to pass an order on the final report/protest petition submitted in the court within a period of two months from the date of production of certified copy of this order before it. 7. With the above observations, the application stands disposed of. Order Date :- 24.4.2025 Rmk. Digitally signed by :- RAM MURTI KUSHWAHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad