IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 877 OF AMARAVATJ^^^^^ Between: Jillela Venkata Swamy, S/o China Kondaiah, Aged about 62 vears R/o PrortH^f:, M Street, Gopavaram\illage and p'Lnchayat Proddatur Mandal, Kadapa District. ...Petitioner AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by Its Principal Secretary to Government, Home Department, AP Secretariat Buildings At Amaravathi, Guntur District. ’ 2. The Superintendent of Police, YSR Kadapa District. 3. Deputy Superintendent of Police, Proddatur Town District. 4. Circle Inspector, Proddalur III town PS, Proddatur, YSR Kadapa District Proddatur III Town Police Station Mandal, YSR Kadapa District, Dubbanna, Aged about 42 years R/o D.No.1/70, Proddatur village and Mandal, YSR Kadapa District. R/o^^r? Mn P^richala Reddy, Aged about 45 years, R/o. D No. 6/46, Chinnasettipalli Village, Rajupalem Mandal, YSR Kadapa District. YSR Kadapa Proddatur ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to seeking a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order, or direction, declaring the action of the 4th and 5th respondents police from unlawfully interfering in civil dispute between the petitioner and the respondents 6 and 7 as illegal, arbitrary, and infringe upon his fundamental rights guaranteed under Articles 14, 19, 21, and 300A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 4'^ and 5*^ respondents police not to interfere over the civil disputes between the petitioner and the , > and 7'^ Respondents except due procedure established by the law. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 4th and 5th respondents police not to interfere over the subject property i.e house in Door No. 17/178 located in Kalvakatta Street, Gopavaram Village & Panchayat, Proddatur Mandal, YSR Kadapa District, Andhra Pradesh pending disposal of main writ petition except due procedure established by the law pending disposal of the above writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI MEDARA SIVA PRASAD Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following order: bvlnc.j W,P,No.877 OF 2025 DT: 06.02.2025 5.THE STATION HOUSE POLICE STATION, DISTRICT. 6.CHELLUBOINA OBULESU, S/0 DUBBANNA years,R/0 D,NO.1/70, PRODDATUR YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. OFFICER, PRODDATUR III town PRODDATUR MANDAL, YSR KADAPA AGED ABOUT 42 VILLAGE AND MANDAL 7.MEESANI LAKSHMI REDDY, S/0 PENCHALA REDDY ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/0. D.NO. 6/46 VILLAGE, RAJUPALEM MANDAL, AGED CHINNASETTIPALLI YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner; 1. MEDARA SIVA PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent(S): TGP FOR HOME The Court made the followi BVLNC.J Page 1 of 5 % W.P No.877 OF 2025 DT: 06,02 2025 APHC010012632025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] j THURSDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSANDAND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 877/202.6 Between: 1.JILLELA VENKATA SWAMY, S/0 CHINA KONDAIAH ABOUT 62 YEARS ,R/0 DOOR NO.17/178 VILLAGE AGED KALVAKATTA AND PANCHAYAT, STREET,GOPAVARAM PRODDATUR MANDAL.KADAPA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1.THE STATE OF AP, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HOME DEPARTMENT, AP SJECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, AT AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2.THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 3.DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PRODDATUR TOWN, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT, 4.CIRCLE INSPECTOR, PRODDALUR PRODDATUR, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. TOWN PS / BVLNC.J W.P.No.877 OF 2025 DT: 06.02.2025 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No.877 OF 2025 ORDER: Heard Sri M.Siva Prasad, learned counsel for petitioner and Sri V.Farook, learned Addl. Government Pleader for Home. 02. Learned Additional Government Pleader for Home on instructions would submit that the petitioner himself presented a report and police conducted preliminary enquiry, and during preliminary enquiry, they asked the petitioner to attend at the police station. Their preliminary enquiry revealed that it is a civil dispute, and they will not interfere in such disputes in the light of law, and police will follow due process of law. 03. The submissions of the learned Additional Government Pleader for Home are placed on record. In the light of submissions made by the learned Additional 04. Government Pleader for Home, this Court is of the considered opinion that no further orders are required in this writ petition, and it can be closed at the stage of admission, without going into merits of the case. BVLNC.J W.P.NO.877 OF2025 DT: 06.02.2025 05. Accordingly, the Writ Petition i There shall be no order as to costs. IS closed at the stage of admission. As a sequel, interlocutory applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- K TATA RAO DEPUTY REGISTRAR '^^CTION^FFICER //TRUE COPY// To 1. One CC to Sri Medara Siva Prasad, Advocate [OPUC; 2. Two CCs to GP for Home, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] 3. Two CD Copies RAM HIGH COURT DATED:06/02/2025 ORDER WP.No.877 of 2025 YCr ' % 0 7 FEB 2025 m !? * Currant Section . ^ CLOSING THE WP AT STAGE OF ADMISSION WITHOUT COSTS