Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Writ Petition No.8295 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 13.03.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH Writ Petition No.8295 of 2025 Kesavan S/o.Mallappa ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Revenue Officer, Krishnagiri District, Krishnagiri. 2.The Sub-Collector, Hosur - 635 109. 3.The Tahsildar, Soolagiri Taluk, Soolagiri, Krishnagiri District. 4.Muniraj S/o.M.Pappayya 5.Eeramma W/o.Late M.Munusamy 6.Krishnammal D/o.Rajammal 7.Ramesh S/o.Puttappa 1/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Writ Petition No.8295 of 2025 8.Munikrishna S/o.Puttappa 9.Soojamma D/o.Puttappa 10.Kanthamma @ Santhamma D/o.Puttappa 11.Malamma @ Maramma D/o.Puttappa 12.Annaiapa S/o.Gurrappa 13.Nanjundan S/o.Gurrappa 14.Munichandran S/o.Gurrappa 15.Subramani S/o.Ramayya 16.Narayanappa S/o.Ramayya 17.Jayamma D/o.Ramayya 18.Santhamma D/o.Ramayya ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the first respondent herein to consider the petitioner's representation dated 05.10.2024 sent for rectifying the mistake occurred during UDR Scheme 2/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Writ Petition No.8295 of 2025 in respect of the petitioner's lands measuring 2.16.0 hectares in S.F.No.715/1 and other lands situated at Dhyaranadurgam Revenue Village, Soolagiri Taluk, Krishnagiri District in accordance with law and within a stipulated period. For Petitioner : Mr.K.Govi Ganesan For Respondents : Mr.P.Sathish Additional Government Pleader [R1 to R3] ***** O R D E R This writ petition has been filed seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the first respondent to deal with the representation made by the petitioner on 05.10.2024 wherein the petitioner has sought for rectification of the entries made during the UDR scheme wherein the names of the private respondents were added in the revenue records. 2. Heard Mr.K.Govi Ganesan, learned counsel for petitioner and Mr.P.Sathish, learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for respondents 1 to 3. 3. The grievance of the petitioner is that he has inherited the subject property from his great grandfather and the patta stood in the 3/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Writ Petition No.8295 of 2025 name of the owner of the property. However, during the UDR scheme, the patta has been wrongly issued in the name of the private respondents. Hence, he has sent a representation dated 05.10.2024 to the first respondent. Since the same was not considered the present writ petition has been filed. 4.
Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case and the materials placed before this Court, there shall be a direction to the first respondent to deal with the representation made by the petitioner on 05.10.2024 on its own merits and in accordance with law and pass orders after affording opportunity to the private respondents within a period of twelve (12) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. This writ petition is disposed of with the above direction. No costs. 13.03.2025 Neutral Citation: Yes/No Index: Yes/no Speaking Order/Non-Speaking Order gm 4/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Writ Petition No.8295 of 2025 To 1.The District Revenue Officer, Krishnagiri District, Krishnagiri. 2.The Sub-Collector, Hosur - 635 109. 3.The Tahsildar, Soolagiri Taluk, Soolagiri, Krishnagiri District. 5/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Writ Petition No.8295 of 2025 N.ANAND VENKATESH, J gm Writ Petition No.8295 of 2025 13.03.2025 6/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis