Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 31544 (CHH)

HEMKANTI SODI v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/3067/2020 · 2025-04-17

Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

-1- NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 3067 of 2020 Hemkanti Sodi W/o Hunga Sodi Aged About 30 Years R/o Village Jeerampal Dabbarash, Tahsil Sukma, District Sukma Chhattisgarh., District : Sukuma, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Panchayat And Rural Development Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar Nava Raipur, District Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Collector Sukma District Sukma Chhattisgarh., District : Sukuma, Chhattisgarh. 3 - Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Sukma District Sukma Chhattisgarh., District : Sukuma, Chhattisgarh. 4 - Smt. Podiyami Deve W/o Podiyami Sukka Aged About 38 Years Cast Gond, R/o Village Jeerampal, Patelpara, Tahsil Sukma, District Sukma Chhattisgarh., District : Sukuma, Chhattisgarh. 5 - Smt. Soni Vando W/o Bhema Vando R/o Village Mukodi, Tahsil Sukma District Sukma District : Sukuma, Chhattisgarh. 6 - Sitaram Nag (Presiding Officer) Polling Booth No. 46, Jeerampal, R/o Office Of Block Education Officer, Sukma District Sukma Chhattisgarh., District : Sukuma, Chhattisgarh 7 - Kishan Negi (Presiding Officer) Polling Booth No. 47, Jeerampal, R/o Offie Of Block Education Officer, Sukma District Sukma, District : Sukuma, Chhattisgarh. 8 - Chandan Thakur, Nag (Presiding Officer) Polling Booth No. 48 Jeerampal Patelpara, R/o Office Of Block Education Officer, Sukma District Sukma, District : Sukuma, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) Digitally signed by NADIM MOHLE -2- For Petitioner : Mr. Prahlad Shrivas, Advocate, holding the brief of Mr. Praveen K. Dhurandhar, Advocate For State : Mr. Prateek Tiwari, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 17.04.2025 1) At the very outset, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that by efflux of time, this writ petition has become infructuous. 2) Not opposed by the other side. 3) Recording the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed being rendered infructuous. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge Nadim