IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Ex. Pet.(T) No.171 of 2025 Decided on: 15th October, 2025 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Negi Ram …..Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and others .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. C.N. Singh, Mr. Devender Sharma and Mr. Anshul Gandhi, Advocates. For the Respondents: Mr. Y.P.S. Dhaulta, Additional Advocate General. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Petitioner seeks enforcement of Negi Ram Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others2. 2. Learned Additional Advocate General has placed on record office instructions dated 14.10.2025 from the office of the Executive Engineer, Jal Shakti Division Karsog, District Mandi, conveying that the aforesaid judgment has been complied with by the respondents under office order dated 20.08.2025. Copy of the aforesaid office order has also been made part of the office instructions. Some other 1 Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes 2 O.A. No.1554 of 2018, decided by the erstwhile H.P. Administrative Tribunal on 20.04.2018 2 documents have also been appended with the office instructions including office order dated 04.09.2025, re-fixing petitioner’s pay and office communication dated 24.09.2025, initiating the process for revision of his pension. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has some reservation to the consideration order passed by the respondents on 20.08.2025. Taking note of the documents placed on record by the respondents, the present execution petition to stand disposed of. The retiral benefits as computed by the respondents in terms of the documents placed on record alongwith the office instructions, be released in favour of the petitioner within six weeks from today. Liberty is however, reserved to the petitioner to seek appropriate remedy for the redressal of his surviving grievances including against the consideration order in accordance with law. Jyotsna Rewal Dua October 15, 2025 Judge Mukesh