Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:106514-DB Court No. - 29 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 8659 of 2025 Petitioner :- Vijay Sagar Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Mohammad Tahir Kurashi,Mohd Shamim Khan,Shadab Ansari Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Hon'ble Vinod Diwakar,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri F.A. Ansari, learned Standing Counsel for State respondents. 2. The instant writ petition has been preferred for a direction to respondents to grant appropriate compensation to the acquired land of the petitioner and for a further direction to respondent no.2- District Magistrate, Siddharth Nagar to decide the representation of the petitioner dated 24.02.2025 within stipulated period. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the land in question has been acquired for public purpose i.e. for establishment of police station/ barracks but till date the compensation has not been disbursed to the petitioner and his brother Ganga Sagar, who is rightful owners. The grand father of the petitioner namely Kashi was the original tenure holder. He had two sons namely Kedar and Jagarnath (father of the petitioner). The property of Kedar had been devolved on his wife (Shanti) and son Bhagauti (Son). The property of Jagar Nath had been devolved on Ganga Sagar and the petitioner. The said Shanti and Bhagauti had sold their share of property to the petitioner. As such the petitioner had become the owner of 3/4th share of property and his brother (Ganga Sagar) had become the owner of 1/4th share of the property. It is alleged that appropriate compensation has not been provided to the petitioner as per his share/holding. 4. After substantial arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner has confined his prayer for a direction to respondent no.2 to decide his representation dated 24.02.2025 within stipulated period. 5. Per contra, learned Standing Counsel states that in case any such claim/ representation is pending consideration, the same shall be considered and decided in accordance with law expeditiously. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on merits of the issue, the writ petition stands disposed of directing respondent no.2 to decide the aforesaid representation of the petitioner in accordance with law expeditiously and preferably within three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order but certainly after giving opportunity to all the stake holders of the property in dispute. Order Date :- 7.7.2025 SP/ Digitally signed by :- SURYA PRAKASH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad