Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 31522 (RAJ)

JHABARMAL S/O ARJUN LAL v. PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT

CW/16157/2024 · 2025-08-26

Sameer Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:33871] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16157/2024 1. Jhabarmal S/o Arjun Lal, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Kochor Mod, Bus Stand, Ranoli, Dist. Sikar, Raj. 2. Keshar Saini S/o Sh. Badriprasad Saini, R/o Kochor Road, Bus Stand, Ranoli, Dist. Sikar, Raj. ----Petitioners Versus 1. Principal Secretary, Public Works Department, Jacob Road, Jaipur, Raj. 2. Block Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti Plasana, Dist. Sikar, Raj. 3. Assistant Engineer, Public Works Department, Block Dataramgarh, District Sikar, Raj. 4. Secretary, Panchayati Raj Department, Government Of Raj., Secretariat Rajasthan, Jaipur. ----Respondents Connected With S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16166/2024 1. Balram S/o Sh. Saplaram, Aged About 73 Years, R/o Harnath Singh Ki Dhani, Kochor Road, Ranoli, Dist. Sikar, Raj. 2. Satyanarayan S/o Sh. Mohan Lal, Aged About 65 Years, R/o Kochor Mod Bus Stand Ranoli, Dist. Sikar, Raj. ----Petitioners Versus 1. Principal Secretary, Public Works Department, Jacob Road, Jaipur, Raj. 2. Block Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti Plasana, Dist. Sikar, Raj. 3. Assistant Engineer, Public Works Department, Block Dataramgarh, District Sikdar, Raj. 4. Secretary, Panchayati Raj Department, Government Of Raj., Secretariat Rajasthan, Jaipur. ----Respondents [2025:RJ-JP:33871] (2 of 2) [CW-16157/2024] For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Nikhil Saini for Mr. Inder Raj Saini For Respondent(s) : Mr. Dheeraj Tripathi, AGC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 26/08/2025 Learned counsel for the respondents has submitted that respondents have filed an additional affidavit stating that respondents have constructed the road as per the Revenue records which stands at the width of 8 meter. On account of the additional affidavit being filed, learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that no grievance survives. In light of the above, the present petitions are disposed of. Howsoever, if the facts are otherwise, the petitioners are at liberty to revive the instant petitions. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of. (SAMEER JAIN),J DEEPAK/82 & 84