{1} ra235-16.doc drp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD REVIEW APPLICATION NO. 235 OF 2016 IN WRIT PETITION NO.3536 OF 2010 Sardar Surjitsingh Jeevansingh Girniwale APPLICANT VERSUS Kachrabai @ Geetabai raHU Gacche (Died) LRs RESPONDENTS ....... Mr. A. A. Mukhedkar, Advocate for the Applicant Mr. S. S. Gangakhedkar, Advocate for Respondent No1A ....... [CORAM : MANJUSHA DESHPANDE, J.] DATE : 11 th MARCH, 2025 ORDER : 1. This motion is made for ‘speaking to the minutes’ in respect of order dated 4th March, 2025. 2. Learned Advocate for the Applicant submits that while allowing the Review, at the request of learned Advocate for the Respondent, status quo was granted by this Court, however, in paragraph No. 27 it is inadvertently recorded that, execution and implementation of this order shall be stayed for a period of four weeks from the date of uploading of this order. 3. Accordingly paragraph No. 27 of the order may be substituted as under : 2025:BHC-AUG:6821This Order is Speaking to Minutes order of order dated // {2} ra235-16.doc “27. Learned Advocate for respondent No.1 prays for stay to implementation of this order. Considering his request, parties are directed to maintain status quo for a period of four weeks from the date of uploading of this order”. 4. Motion stands allowed accordingly. Corrected copy be uploaded. [ MANJUSHA DESHPANDE ] JUDGE drp/ra235-16.doc This Order is Speaking to Minutes order of order dated //