Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 31513 (KAR)

TOWN MUNICIPAL CORPORATION v. SHRI. VEERAIAH S

WP/48668/2012 · 2025-06-09

Anant Ramanath Hegde

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:19511 WP No. 48668 of 2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE WRIT PETITION NO.48668 OF 2012 (L-TER) BETWEEN: TOWN MUNICIPAL CORPORATION HUNSUR MYSORE DISTRICT - 571 105 REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF OFFICER. …PETITIONER (BY SRI S.B. TOTAD, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SHRI. VEERAIAH S. S/O. SHRI. NANJAIAH AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS. 2. SHRI. AMAVASE S/O. SHRI. KUPPAIAH AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS. 3. SHRI. R. RAMU S/O. SHRI. SATHYAMANGALADA RANGAIAH, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS. 4. SHRI. SAATOORA SINCE DEAD, REPRESENTED BY LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: a. SMT. GEETHA W/O. LATE SHRI. SATOORA AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS. b. MASTER VISHNU S/O. LATE SHRI. SATOORA AGED ABOUT 7 YEARS. Digitally signed by MOUNESHWARAPPA NAGARATHNA Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:19511 WP No. 48668 of 2012 c. MS. PAVITHRA D/O. LATE SATOORA AGED ABOUT 6 YEARS. d. MASTER MAAGALI S/O. LATE SHRI. SATOORA RESPONDENT NOS.4(a) TO (d) ARE MINORS, REPRESENTED BY NATURAL GUARDIAN MOTHER SMT. GEETHA. 5. SMT. GOWRAMMA W/O. SHRI. KUPPAIAH AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS. 6. SHRI. DORESWAMY S/O. SHRI. BEGURU RANGAIAH AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS. 7. SHRI. RANGA S/O. SHRI. NANJAIAH AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS. 8. 9. SHRI. NANJA S/O. SRI CHIKKAKARUPA AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS. SHRI. CHIKKAMANGALI S/O. SHRI. MAANKALI AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS. 10. SHRI. RAMASWAMY S/O. SHRI. CHINNAIAH AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS. 11. SHRI. RAMESHA S/O. SHRI. NAGARAJU AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS. 12. SHRI. C. KRISHNA S/O. SHRI. CHIKKANANJAIAH AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:19511 WP No. 48668 of 2012 RESPONDENT NOS.1 TO 12 ARE RESIDING AT POURA KARMINKARA COLONY, HUNSUR MYSORE DISTRICT - 571 105. 13. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER MYSORE DISTRICT MYSORE - 570 024. 14. THE COMMISSIONER DEPARTMENT OF MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION M.S. BUILDING BENGALURU - 560 001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. PRATHIBA R.K., A.G.A., FOR R-14, SRI R. PRAMOD, ADVOCATE, FOR R-9 & 10, & R-1 TO R-3, R-5 TO R-8 & R-11 TO 13 ARE SERVED) * * * THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER WRIT QUASHING THE AWARD DATED 8-3-2012 PASSED IN REFERENCE NO.88 OF 2006 ON THE FILE OF THE LABOUR COURT, MYSORE, AS PER ANNEXURE-C. THIS WRIT PETITION IS COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:19511 WP No. 48668 of 2012 ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo stating that the award passed by the Labour Court, which is impugned in the writ petition, is complied. Thus, he would submit that the petitioner would not proceed with the matter. 2. The Court has perused the copy of the order dated 27-10-2023, which is made available today. Same is taken on record. Considering the submission and the order dated 27-10-2023, this Court is of the view that the petition does not survive for consideration. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. In view of the dismissal of the petition, pending applications, if any, shall stand dismissed. Sd/- (ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE) JUDGE KVK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 3