1 / 3 2025:CGHC:39630 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 5740 of 2021 1 - Smt Yogeshwari Pradhan W/o Shri Kamal Kishor Pradhan Aged About 28 Years Occupation Rasoiya R/o Gram Makadi, Vikaskhand Makadi, District Kondagaon Chhattisgarh., District : Kondagaon, Chhattisgarh 2 - Smt. Jamuna Netam W/o Shri Mahendra Netam Aged About 29 Years Occupation Rasoiya R/o Gram Makadi, Vikaskhand Makadi, District Kondagaon Chhattisgarh., District : Kondagaon, Chhattisgarh 3 - Kumari Parwati Nag W/o Shri Sukadu Ram Nag Aged About 28 Years Occupation Rasoiya R/o Gram Makadi, Vikaskhand Makadi, District Kondagaon Chhattisgarh., District : Kondagaon, Chhattisgarh 4 - Kumari Rambha Yadav W/o Shri Meghnath Yadav Aged About 26 Years Occupation Chowkidar, R/o Gram Makadi, Vikaskhand Makadi, District Kondagaon Chhattisgarh., District : Kondagaon, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Sachiv, School Shiksha Vibhag, Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Sanchalak Lokshikshan Sanchalnalay Indrawati Bhawan Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Collector Kondagaon, District Kondagaon Chhattisgarh., District : Kondagaon, Chhattisgarh 4 - Mukhya Karyapalan Adhikari Jila Panchayat, District Kondagaon Chhattisgarh., District : Kondagaon, Chhattisgarh 5 - Mukhya Karyapalan Adhikari Janpad Panchayat Makdi, District Kondagaon Chhattisgarh., District : Kondagaon, Chhattisgarh 6 - Jila Shiksha Adhikari / Sah Jila Pariyojana Adhikari Kondagaon Chhattisgarh., District : Kondagaon, Chhattisgarh 7 - Vikaskhand Shiksha Adhikari Vikaskhand Makadi, District Kondagaon Chhattisgarh., District : Kondagaon, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents REKHA SINGH 2 / 3 For Petitioners : Mr. Abdul Moin Khan, Advocate holding the brief of Mr.Abdul Wahab Khan, Advocate For Respondents/State : Mr. Shubham Bajpayee, PL Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Judgment On Board 07.08.2025 1. The limited grievance that the petitioners have in the instant case is the action on the part of the petitioners in discontinuing the services of petitioners. 2. According to the counsel for petitioners, they were all working as daily wage employee under the respondents and suddenly, the services of the petitioners were discontinued. 3. Today when the matter is taken up for hearing, counsel for the petitioners submits that he has instruction to state that there is availability of work in the department and they are also in need of daily wage employees, however, ignoring the claim of petitioners for said work they are appointing third persons against the said post. 4. The only prayer that the petitioners make at this juncture is that, if at all, if the respondents intend to engage daily wage workers, let the petitioners be given some preferential right and to be continued instead of appointing fresh personnel. The respondents be directed to take work from the petitioners considering their experience and the length of service rendered by them. 5. Given the said grievance that the petitioners have, the writ petition at this juncture is disposed of directing the respondents authorities to look into the grievance of petitioners and try to redress the same as far as possible by reengaging the petitioners, if at all if the State or the 3 / 3 respondents intend to get work from the daily wage workers. 6. With the aforesaid observation(s)/direction(s), the present petition is disposed of. SD/- Rakesh Mohan Pandey JUDGE Rekha