Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 31502 (KAR)

MRS. D.R. AMBIKA v. M/S CANARA BANK

WP/20374/2023 · 2025-03-03

M Nagaprasanna

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:8973 WP No. 20374 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 20374 OF 2023 (GM-DRT) BETWEEN: 1. MRS. D.R. AMBIKA W/O MR. D.G. RAJAPPA, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, R/AT DODDERI VILLAGE, CHILUR POST, HONNALI TALUK, DAVANAGERE DISTRICT - 577 230. 2. MR. D.G. RAJAPPA, S/O MR. D.G. BASAPPA, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, R/AT DODDERI VILLAGE, CHILUR POST, HONNALI TALUK, DAVANAGERE DISTRICT - 577 230. 3. MR. D.G. SURESH, S/O MR. D.G. BASAPPA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/AT DODDERI VILLAGE, CHILUR POST, HONNALI TALUK, DAVANAGERE DISTRICT - 577 230. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. PRAKASH K.A, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. M/S. CANARA BANK, CHILUR BRANCH, GROUND FLOOR, Digitally signed by NAGAVENI Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:8973 WP No. 20374 of 2023 "SREEKANTHA NILAYA" MAIN ROAD, CHILUR, DAVANAGERE - 577 230, REPRESENTED BY ITS BRANCH MANAGER. 2. THE RECOVERY OFFICER-2 DEBT RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-1, 4TH FLOOR, TELEPHONE HOUSE, RAJ BHAVAN ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. LATHA SHETTY, ADVOCATE FOR C/R1) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO i) QUASHING THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 21/09/2019 PASSED IN O.A NO. 55/2019 BY THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-1 AT BENGALURU AND THE SUBSEQUENT RECOVERY PROCEEDINGS INITIATED BY THE RECOVERY OFFICER-2 IN R.C. NO. 1054/2019 IN OA NO. 55/19 BY WAY OF SALE PROCLAMATION DATED 17/07/2023 (ANNEXURE-A) AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA ORAL ORDER The petitioners are before this Court calling in question the notification of sale of the property belonging to the petitioners. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:8973 WP No. 20374 of 2023 2. The learned counsel appearing for the respondent - Bank submits that on the date fixed for the sale, sale has not been taken place. The date of sale having been spent itself, nothing further would survive for consideration in the case at hand. 3. In that light, the petition is rendered infructuous, reserving liberty to the petitioner to avail of such remedy as is available in law, if need arises. Accordingly, the petition stands disposed of. Sd/- ______________________ JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA JY List No.: 1 Sl No.: 5 CT: BHK