- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:3233 RFA No. 1767 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 1767 OF 2023 (INJ) BETWEEN: SRI NAVEEN.S.METAGUD S/O SIDRAMAPPA, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, R/AT R.S.NO.145/B, C/O S.G.METGUD GINNING FACTORY, GOKAK, BELGAUM DISTRICT. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. VARUN PATIL., ADVOCATE) AND: SMT. POONGODI W/O G.N.MALLIKARJUNAIAH, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, R/AT NO.27, GOKUL 1ST STAGE, 3RD PHASE, 2ND MAIN ROAD, 5TH CROSS, YESHWANTHPURA, BENGALURU-560 022. …RESPONDENT THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 READ WITH ORDER 41 (1) OF THE CPC, 1908. THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Counsel for the appellant has appeared in person and sought time to comply with the office objections. Digitally signed by THEJASKUMAR N Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:3233 RFA No. 1767 of 2023 As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the appeal was listed before Registrar (P & H) on several dates and sufficient time was granted to comply with the office objections. Again the appeal was listed on 08.01.2025, on that day, finally a week's time was granted to comply with the office objections, failing which the office was directed to list the appeal under the caption ‘for dismissal of appeal for non-compliance of office objections’ on 24.01.2025. The appeal is listed today under the caption ‘for dismissal of appeal for non-compliance of office objections’. Despite granting sufficient time, the appellant has not complied with the office objections. It appears that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. In view of peremptory order dated 08.01.2025, the appeal is dismissed for non- compliance of office objections. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 9