117 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA Kartar Singh State of Haryana and another CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA Present: Mr. SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA, J. (Oral) 1. Learned counsel submits that he is not pressing the challenge made in the writ petition relating to the Articles of the Indian Constitution, he, however, presses the writ petition with regard to challenge dismissal of the petitioner vide order dated 11.12. 2. We find regular appeal can be filed before the Educational Tribunal, which is functional. 3. In view thereto, the writ petition is dismissed on account of alternate remedy available to th appeal is filed within one month from today, the same shall be decided on merits sans limitation. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-6068-2025 Date of Decision: Vs. State of Haryana and another HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA Mr. Munish Mittal, Advocate for the petitioner. *** SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA, J. (Oral) Learned counsel submits that he is not pressing the challenge made in the writ petition relating to the Articles of the Indian Constitution, he, however, presses the writ petition with regard to challenge dismissal of the petitioner vide order dated 11.12.2023. We find that the order dated 11.12.2023 regular appeal can be filed before the Educational Tribunal, which is In view thereto, the writ petition is dismissed on account of alternate remedy available to the petitioner. However, it is noted that if an appeal is filed within one month from today, the same shall be decided on merits sans limitation. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 2025 (O&M) Date of Decision: 29.04.2025 …Petitioner …Respondent HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA Advocate for the petitioner. SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA, J. (Oral) Learned counsel submits that he is not pressing the challenge made in the writ petition relating to the Articles of the Indian Constitution, he, however, presses the writ petition with regard to challenge dismissal of that the order dated 11.12.2023, is appealable and a regular appeal can be filed before the Educational Tribunal, which is In view thereto, the writ petition is dismissed on account of e petitioner. However, it is noted that if an appeal is filed within one month from today, the same shall be decided on Learned counsel submits that he is not pressing the challenge made in the writ petition relating to the Articles of the Indian Constitution, he, however, presses the writ petition with regard to challenge dismissal of , is appealable and a regular appeal can be filed before the Educational Tribunal, which is In view thereto, the writ petition is dismissed on account of e petitioner. However, it is noted that if an appeal is filed within one month from today, the same shall be decided on RAJESH KUMAR 2025.05.01 15:03 I attest the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. CWP-6068-2025 (O&M) [2] 4. The writ petition is dismissed accordingly. 5. All pending misc. application(s) also stand disposed of. (SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA) JUDGE (MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA) JUDGE 29.04.2025 rajesh 1. Whether speaking/reasoned? : Yes/No 2. Whether reportable? : Yes/No RAJESH KUMAR 2025.05.01 15:03 I attest the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.