Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 31494 (JHR)

ANIL KUMAR SINHA v. THE CANARA BANK, THROUGH ITS REGIONAL MANAGER

WPC/41/2025 · 2025-03-20

Rajesh Shankar

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No. 41 of 2025 --- Anil Kumar Sinha son of Late Baliram Prasad, resident of Manjhi Tola, Road No.-1 Tripurari Colony, Behind Rain Basera, P.O. & P.S.- Adityapur, District- Seraikella-Kharsawan … … Petitioner Versus 1. Canara Bank through its Regional Manager, Dimna Road, P.O.- Dimna, P.S.- Mango, Jamshedpur, District – East Singhbhum 2. The Branch Manager, Canara Bank, Ward No. 2, Govindnagar, Main Road, Kadma, P.O. & P.S.- Kadma, Jamshedpur, District- East Singhbhum …. … Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR For the Petitioner : Mr. Vikash Kumar, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Pratyush Kumar, Advocate Mr. Taru Gupta, Advocate Order No. 06 Dated: 20.03.2025 The present writ petition has been filed for issuance of direction upon the respondent no. 2 to immediately unfreeze the savings account of the petitioner (Saving Account No. 75702010032706) lying in Canara Bank, Kadma Branch, Jamshedpur. 2. Mr. Pratyush Kumar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents, submits that though no counter affidavit has been filed in this case, however he has received instruction from the respondent-Bank that the aforesaid bank account of the petitioner is operational. Hence, the petitioner’s prayer made in the writ petition to unfreeze the said bank account is unwarranted. 3. Keeping in view the aforesaid submission made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents, there is no need to further proceed in the matter. 4. The present writ petition is accordingly disposed of. Ritesh/ (Rajesh Shankar, J.)