APHC010455592013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] THURSDAY,THE TENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 15356/2013 Between: 1. SRI PADMAVATHI BOILED DALL & FLOUR MILL, REP.BY ITS PARTNER SRI T.PANDU RANGE NARAYANA RAO S/O.ANJANEYULU, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, PLOT NOS.11, 12 AND 13, INDUSTRIAL ESTATE, CHILAKALAPUDI, MACHILIPATNAM MANDAL, KRISHNA DISUICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. ANDHRA PRADESH INDUSTRIAL INFRASTRUCTURE CORPORATION LTD, Industrial Estate, Machilipatnam, Krishna District. Rep.by its Commissioner ...RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent herein in enhancing the property tax contrary to Section 81 to 87 r/w. Sec.389-B of A.P. Municipalities Act 1965 as arbitrary, illegal and capricious and consequently direct the respondent to follow the due process of law in levying the property tax to the petitioner's property IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WVMP 3477 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased vacate the interim orders dated 04.06.2013 passed in WPMP No. 18559 of 2013 in WP No. 15356 of 2013 and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2013(WPMP 18559 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of collections of enhanced tax pursuant to the Demand notice dt.11- 10-2012 pending disposal of the above writ petition IA NO: 5 OF 2013(WPMP 90366 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SAI GANGADHAR CHAMARTY Counsel for the Respondent: 1. RAMA CHANDRA RAO GURRAM 2. P ROY REDDY The Court made the following ORDER: Sri K. Raghu, learned counsel representing Sri Sai Gangadhar Chamarty, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive and the same has rendered infructuous. Recording the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _____________________ SUBBA REDDY SATTI, J Date: 10.07.2025 ikn 251 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 15356 OF 2013 Date: 10.07.2025 ikn