RSA-3614-2003 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 110 RSA-3614-2003 Date of decision: 19.09.2025 Rameshwar Dass ......Appellant Vs. State of Haryana and others .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA Present: None for the appellant. Mr. Ram Karan Sharma, DAG, Haryana **** SUDEEPTI SHARMA J. (Oral) 1. Today there is no representation on behalf of the appellant. 2. On the last date of hearing also, none appeared on behalf of the appellant. The Registry was directed to issue notice to the appellant as well as to his counsel. 3. As per the report of Registry, the appellant could not be served due to incomplete address. However, learned counsel for the appellant has been informed through e-mail. In view of the above, despite service, no one put in appearance on behalf of the appellant. 4. Hence, this Court is left with no choice but to dismiss the present appeal for want of prosecution. 5. Dismissed for non-prosecution. 6. However, liberty is granted to the appellant to revive the instant appeal, if cause of action still survives. September 19th, 2025 (SUDEEPTI SHARMA) Sahil JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No SAHIL 2025.09.19 18:30 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.