SUMAN VISHWAS URF RAM S/O SHRI SAIYARMAL VISHWAS v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/13214/2023 · 2025-01-30
Anil Kumar Upman
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 31483 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 31483 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 13214/2023 Suman Vishwas Urf Ram S/o Shri Saiyarmal Vishwas, Aged About 30 Years, Resident Of Village Talikhola, Post Shripura, Bajar, Police Station Balagar, District Hooghly, West Bengal, At Present Tenant House No. 301, Shri Sai Shyam Apartment/hotel Vinowa Bhave Nagar, Near Nursery Circle, Vaishali Nagar, Police Station Chitrkut, Jaipur (Raj.) (At Present Confined In Central Jail Jaipur) ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor
2. Ganesh Saini Son Of Shri Surjan Singh, R/o Ci Dst, Jaipur West (Raj) ----Respondents Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4024/2024 Swapan Mandal @ Tarun S/o Mohan Mandal, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Gaosaichar, Police Station Ranaghat, Nadiya, West Bengal. At Present Tenant In Flat No. 301, Plot No. A-58, Shri Sai Shyam Apartment, Vinobha Bhave Nagar, Vaishali Nagar, Jaipur. (At Present Confined In Central Jail, Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Nirmal K. Sharma Mr. Vijendra Yadav For Respondent(s) : Mr. M.S. Shekhawat, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 30/01/2025 After arguing at some length, learned counsels for the petitioners wants to withdraw these bail applications with liberty to
(2 of 2) [CRLMB-13214/2023] renew the prayer of bail applications after recording testimony of star witness Prakash Viswas S/o. Nirapad Viswas. Accordingly, these bail applications are dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. However, trial Court is requested to record the testimony of star witness Prakash Viswas S/o. Nirapad Viswas on priority basis. Learned State counsel is directed to instruct the SHO concerned to ensure the presence of the aforesaid witness before the trial court on date fixed for his testimony. It would be the personal responsibility of the SHO concerned to secure presence of the aforesaid witness before the trial court for recording his evidence.
(ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J ANAND TANWAR /51-52