Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3148 (UTT)

RASHMI CHANDOLA v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPMS/663/2025 · 2025-05-02

Ravindra Maithani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS D1- 20 WPMS No.663 of 2025 Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. Mr. Bhuwan Bhatt and Mr. V.K. Kaparuwan, Advocates for the petitioner. Mr. Ganesh Kandpal, D.A.G. for the State. The petitioner claims that she was appointed as Notary in District Pauri Garhwal. A Renewal Application was filed by her on 18.06.2024, but it has yet not been decided. Heard. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the term of the petitioner, as Notary, was to expire on 17.02.2025. Prior to that, the petitioner had already filed a renewal application dated 18.06.2024. IT has yet not been decided. Learned State Counsel gives a statement that the renewal application of the petitioner shall be decided within eight weeks. The writ petition is disposed of with the direction to the respondents to decide the renewal application of the petitioner within a period of eight weeks from today. (Ravindra Maithani J.) 02.05.2025 RV