2025:JHHC:15682 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(Criminal) No.363 of 2025 ------ Basab Sen, S/o Lt. Kamal Krishna Sen. … … Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand. 2. The Secretary, Department of Home, Jail and Disaster Management, Government of Jharkhand, Dhurwa, Ranchi, Jharkhand. 3. The Deputy Commissioner-cum-District Magistrate, Ranchi, Collectorate Building, Kutchery Chowk, Kotwali, Ranchi, Jharkhand. 4. The Senior Superintendent of Police, Ranchi, Collectorate Building, Kutchery Chowk, Kotwali, Ranchi, Jharkhand. 5. The Superintendent of Police, Ranchi (City), Collectorate Building, Kutchery Chowk, Kotwali, Ranchi, Jharkhand. 6. The Sub Divisional Magistrate, Ranchi, Collectorate Building, Kutchery Chowk, Kotwali, Ranchi, Jharkhand. 7. The Officer-in-Charge, Sadar Police Station, P.O. Ranchi GPO, P.S. Sadar, District Ranchi, Jharkhand. 8. Ashok Kumar Pandey. … … Respondents ------ CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the petitioner : Mr. Anil Kumar, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Rajiv Ranjan, Advocate ------ 03/ 16.06.2025 The petitioner in this Criminal Writ Petition has prayed for following reliefs:- a. “For issuance of an appropriate writ(s), order(s) or direction(s) upon Respondents to take appropriate action against Respondent No. 8 who has illegally trespassed and captured the landed property of the Petitioner situated at Village/Mauza: Kokar, Revenue P.S. No.:196, and being part of Plot No.:419, marked as 419/A under Khata No.:100, ad measuring area of 4 Kathas 14 chataks and 10 Sq. Ft. without even a single chit of paper and thereafter the possession of the same may be restored to the Petitioner; b. Further directing upon the Superintendent of Police, Ranchi (Respondent No.:5), S.D.M. (Respondent No.:6) and the Officer-In-Charge, Ranchi/Sadar P.S. 2025:JHHC:15682 (Respondent No.: 7) to institute FIR against Respondent No. 8 for criminally trespassing and grabbing the land of the Petitioner and further refraining the Respondent No. 8 from continuing with the illegal possession over the Petitioner’s property; c. Further directing the Respondents to consider the representation of the Petitioner dated 07.11.2022 (Annexure – 6) and after making enquiry appropriate action be taken against Respondent No. 8 for criminal trespass and land grabbing the property of the Petitioner and for restoring the possession of the Petitioner;” 2. Heard the parties. 3. Learned counsel representing the petitioner submits that the F.I.R. now has already been lodged. 4. Since the F.I.R. has already been lodged, I am not inclined to entertain this writ petition. 5. Accordingly, this Criminal Writ Petition is rendered infructuous. 6. However, it is expected that the investigation will be concluded as early as possible. (ANANDA SEN, J.) Prashant.Cp-3