Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3147 (UTT)

RAJKUMAR ALIAS RAJU v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/146/2025 · 2025-05-21

Pankaj Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPCRL No.146 of 2025 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. Mohit Kumar Kashyap, learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. Mr. Vipul Painuly, learned AGA for the State. 3. Learned State Counsel made a statement at Bar on instruction that after investigation, the charge-sheet has been submitted against the petitioner on 07.04.2025, therefore, nothing remains to be decided in this writ petition and it has become infructuous. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he would challenge the said charge-sheet in the appropriate proceedings before the appropriate forum. 5. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the parties, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. However, it is open to the petitioner to challenge the charge-sheet in appropriate proceedings, before the appropriate forum. 6. The interim order shall remain operative till the charge-sheet is submitted before the Court. (Pankaj Purohit J.) 21.05.2025 Ravi