Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3147 (RAJ)

ROHIT RAJORIYA S/O SHRI DURGALAL RAJORIYA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMP/194/2022 · 2025-09-25

Sudesh Bansal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:39570] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 194/2022 Rohit Rajoriya S/o Shri Durgalal Rajoriya, R/o Bajrang Nursery, Heeda Ki Mori, Ramganj Bazar Khatikan Mohalla Jaipur. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P 2. Victim, Aged About 33 Years, R/o ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Praveen Kumar Jain Mr. Vaibhav Jeswani through VC For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP Mr. Sudarshan Singh Laddha for complainant HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL Order 25/09/2025 1. The instant Criminal Misc. Petition was filed by accused petitioner way back on 06.01.2022, for quashing of FIR No.50/2021, registered at Police Station Mahila Thana, Bundi for offences under Sections 376 and 506 of IPC. 2. Learned Public Prosecutor so also counsel for respondent No.2-complainant/victim pointed out that after investigation, police submitted negative final report. In counter, counsel for the accused petitioner submits that after negative final report, a protest petition was filed whereupon the trial Court took cognizance and the matter has been sent to the Sessions Court and the Sessions Court has framed charges against petitioner for the offences under Sections 376 and 506 of IPC vide order dated 16.04.2025. [2025:RJ-JP:39570] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-194/2022] 3. Counsel for the petitioner submits that complainant is not willing to prosecute the petitioner and likely to finalize the mutual settlement, to quash the FIR. 4. Taking into consideration the above development in the present case, the prayer for quashing of FIR has rendered infructuous, in view of submission of filing of negative final report, however, if accused petitioner is aggrieved by framing of charge vide order dated 16.04.2025, he is at liberty to assail the order of charge by filing Criminal Revision Petition. It is also hereby observed that in case compromise is finalized between the parties, the petitioner may produce the compromise before the trial Court. 5. With aforesaid liberties, instant petition stand disposed of. 6. Stay application and pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (SUDESH BANSAL),J pcg /187