Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 31468 (KAR)

SMT N SUNITHA v. SRI SAGAR M K

WP/51228/2019 · 2025-01-24

Jyoti Mulimani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:3235 WP No. 51228 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 51228 OF 2019 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SMT N.SUNITHA W/O SAGAR M.K., AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/AT 546. 16TH CROSS, 3RD MAIN, VISWAPRIYA LAYOUT, BEGUR, BANGALORE-68. 2. KUM.HARJITHA S/O SAGAR M.K. AGED ABOUT 11 YEARS, MINOR GUARDIAN REP. BY HIS MOTHER-PETITIONER NO.1. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. MANJUNATHA.P., ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND: SRI SAGAR M.K. S/O ANANTHA RAM SING, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, OWNER OF S.S.ENTERPRISES, R/AT "GANGA NILAYA", 32/2, 6TH CROSS, CHOLURAPALYA, MAIN ROAD, BANGALORE-560 023. AND OTHER ADDRESS SAGAR ARTS, NO.18, 1ST FLOOR, 1ST CROSS, VIDYARANYANAGARA, NEAR PRASANNA THEATER, MAGADI ROAD, BANGALORE-560 023. …RESPONDENT Digitally signed by THEJASKUMAR N Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:3235 WP No. 51228 of 2019 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Though matter called twice, the petitioners are not represented. When the case is listed and called out, the advocate must be present. The absence may affect the case. As could be seen from the writ papers, the petition is filed in the year 2019. Now we are in the month of January 2025. The petition is pending from six years. As already noted above, though matter called twice, the petitioners are not represented. It appears that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE TKN List No.: 2 Sl No.: 6