MD. KAIF ANSARI @ MD KAIF v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
Cr.A(SJ)/72/2025 · 2025-07-30
Gautam Kumar Choudhary
Criminal Appealbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 31461 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 31461 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:JHHC:21155 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cr. Appeal (S.J.) No.72 of 2025
------ Md. Kaif Ansari @ Md. Kaif, S/o Md. Mustak Ansari, R/o Village- Gojodih, PO- Kushamal & PS- Birni, District- Giridih (Jharkhand) through his mother, Shayara Bano, W/o Md. Mustak Ansari, R/o Village- Gojodih, PO- Kushamal & PS- Birni, District- Giridih (Jharkhand). .... .... Appellant
Versus The State of Jharkhand.
… …. Respondents
………
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GAUTAM KUMAR CHOUDHARY
………
For the Appellant : M/s Ankit Apurva, Advocate
For the State
: Mr. Praful Jojo, APP
------
Order No. 03 / Dated : 30.07.2025.
1. Earlier prayer for bail of the appellant was rejected on merits by the learned Court below. Thereafter Cr. Revision No.32 of 2024 filed by the appellant/ petitioner was dismissed vide order dated 01.08.2024.
2. The instant Crl. Appeal (SJ) has been preferred against the order dated 27.11.2024 passed in Misc. Cr. Application No.1740 of 2024 in connection with Children Case No.01 of 2024 arising out of Birni P.S. Case No.104 of 2023 for the offence under Sections 366A/ 354D/ 376(3)/ 307/ 302/34 IPC
3. The prayer for bail has been renewed on the ground that the witnesses so far examined have not supported the case of the prosecution.
4. Learned A.P.P. has defended the impugned order.
5. Having considered the submissions advanced on behalf of both the sides and perusing the materials on record, I do not find any change of circumstance to consider the renewal of the bail application. Criminal Appeal stands dismissed.
(Gautam Kumar Choudhary, J.) Sandeep/