Research › Search › Judgment
High Court of Chhattisgarh · body
2025 DAILYLAW 31460 (CHH)
NYAR KUMAR YADAV v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
WPC/3540/2022 · 2025-04-09
Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad
body2025
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 31460 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 31460 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2025:CGHC:16736
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 3540 of 2022 Nyar Kumar Yadav S/o Sitaram Yadav Aged About 35 Years R/o Gram Panchayat Batwahi, Tehsil Lundra, District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh
... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Panchayat And Rural Administration, Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, Chhattisgarh.
2 - Collector Surguja, District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh 3 - Sub Divisional Officer/ Prescribed Officer Dhaurpur, District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh 4 - Tehsildar Lundra (Dhaurpur), District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh 5 - Karamsai Nagesh S/o Moharsai Nagesh Sarpach-Gram Panchayat Batwahi, Tehsil Lundra, District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh 6 - Taimun Nisha W/o Ali Ansari Panch- Gram Panchayat Batwahi, Tehsil Lundra, District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh 7 - Sunita Nagesh W/o Sukhdev Panch- Gram Panchayat Batwahi, Tehsil Lundra, District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh 8 - Umesh Kumar Paikra S/o Jayant Panch- Gram Panchayat Batwahi, Tehsil Lundra, District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh 9 - Usman Faruq S/o Mohammad Sadiq Ansari Panch- Gram Panchayat Batwahi, Tehsil Lundra, District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh YOGESH TIWARI Digitally signed by YOGESH TIWARI Date: 2025.04.09 19:06:55 +0530 2 10 - Silbanus Tigga S/o Suman Tigga Panch- Gram Panchayat Batwahi, Tehsil Lundra, District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh 11 - Basant Nagesh S/o Ghasi Nagesh Panch- Gram Panchayat Batwahi, Tehsil Lundra, District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh 12 - Panmeshwari S/o Saman Ram Panch- Gram Panchayat Batwahi, Tehsil Lundra, District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh 13 - Rajkumari W/o Akhilesh Kumar Nagesh Panch- Gram Panchayat Batwahi, Tehsil Lundra, District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh 14 - Bimla W/o Vijay Nagesh Panch- Gram Panchayat Batwahi, Tehsil Lundra, District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh 15 - Nirigpal Nagesh S/o Atmamay Nagesh Panch- Gram Panchayat Batwahi, Tehsil Lundra, District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh 16 - Bhola Ram Ravi S/o Ramlagan Ravi Panch- Gram Panchayat Batwahi, Tehsil Lundra, District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh 17 - Ramvichar Yadav S/o Dagar Ram Yadav Panch- Gram Panchayat Batwahi, Tehsil Lundra, District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh 18 - Pano Nagesh S/o Maansai Nagesh Panch- Gram Panchayat Batwahi, Tehsil Lundra, District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh 19 - Mochi Ram S/o Lakhu Panch- Gram Panchayat Batwahi, Tehsil Lundra, District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh 20 - Meena Yadav W/o Buddhasen Yadav Panch- Gram Panchayat Batwahi, Tehsil Lundra, District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh 21 - Tilango S/o Pint Nagesh Panch- Gram Panchayat Batwahi, Tehsil Lundra, District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh 22 - Sindhu Yadav S/o Durga Prasad Panch- Gram Panchayat Batwahi, Tehsil Lundra, District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh 23 - Roshni Nagesh W/o Ajay Nagesh Panch- Gram Panchayat Batwahi, Tehsil Lundra, District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh 24 - Parwati Yadav W/o Mantosh Yadav Panch- Gram Panchayat Batwahi, Tehsil Lundra, District : Surguja (Ambikapur),
Chhattisgarh ... Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System)
3 For Petitioner : Mr. K. N. Meher, Advocate on Mr. Ishan Verma, Advocate For Respondent/State : Mr. Anmol Sharma, Panel Lawyer Hon’ble Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad, Judge
Order on Board 09.04.2025 1 Heard Mr. K.N. Meher, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Ishan Verma,
learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. Anmol Sharma, learned Panel Lawyer, appearing for the State. 2
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that by efflux of time, instant writ petition has become infructuous, as such, he does not want to press this writ petition. 3
Learned counsel appearing for the respective respondents have no objection. 4 Accordingly, instant writ petition is dismissed as having rendered infructuous.
Sd/-
(Amitendra Kishore Prasad)
Judge Yogesh