HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD FIRST APPEAL No. - 693 of 2002 Court No. - 35 HON'BLE SANDEEP JAIN, J. 1. Heard Shri S.K. Mishra, learned counsel for the appellant. None is present for the respondents. 2. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that in the instant appeal, the Award and Decree dated 23.05.2002 passed by the court of 12th A.D.J., Aligarh in L.A.R. No. 29/1996 (Tejveer Singh v. State of UP) is under challenge. Learned counsel submits that the landowners had also challenged the impugned Award by preferring the First Appeal No. 660 of 2002 (Tejveer Singh v. State of UP and others) which was allowed by Division Bench of this Court vide order dated 28.10.2015 whereby the matter was remitted back to the Reference Court for deciding it afresh in the light of the observations made by the Division Bench of this Court. 3. Learned counsel submitted that since the impugned Award of the Reference Court has itself been set aside by the Division Bench of this Court vide order dated 28.10.2015, as such, this appeal has become infructuous and it be accordingly disposed. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the appellant and perused the record. 5. It is apparent that the landowners had also challenged the impugned Award of the Reference Court by filing First Appeal No. 660 of 2002 (Tejveer Singh v. State of UP and others) which was allowed by Division Bench of this Court vide order dated 28.10.2015 and the matter was remitted back to the Reference Court for deciding it afresh in the light of the observations made in that order. Since, the Award of the Reference Court Versus Counsel for Appellant(s) : S.K.Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : Alok Kumar Yadav, Ishwar Chandra Tyagi, M.K.Gupta, Pankaj Agarwal U.P.State Industrial Development Corpn. .....Appellant(s) Tejveer Singh Secy. Deep Shikha Gramin Grih Nirman And Others .....Respondent(s) has itself been set aside, as such, the instant appeal, which seeks to reduce the compensation awarded by the Reference Court, has become infructuous. 6. Accordingly, the instant appeal is dismissed as having become infructuous. 7. However, in the facts and circumstances of the case, the parties shall bear their own costs. 8. Office is directed to prepare the decree accordingly. September 22, 2025 Rama Kant FAPL No. 693 of 2002 2 (Sandeep Jain,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAMA KANT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad