Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 31446 (KAR)

M/S PRADEEP SURGICAL DRESSINGS PVT LTD v. THE COMMISSIONER

WP/201/2020 · 2025-02-06

Jyoti Mulimani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:5460 WP No. 201 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 201 OF 2020 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: M/S. PRADEEP SURGICAL DRESSINGS PVT LTD., NO.S-404, HM TAMBOURINE, KANAKAPURA MAIN ROAD, JARAGANAHALLI, J. P. NAGAR, 6TH PHASE, BENGALURU-560 078. REP BY SRI. PRADEEP RAO, MANAGING DIRECTOR. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. PRATHAP.S.S., ADVOCATE FOR SRI.MONESH KUMAR.K.B., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE COMMISSIONER, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE, ANAND RAO CIRCLE, BENGALURU-560 002. 2. THE ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR, KARNATAKA STATE DRUGS LOGISTICS AND WAREHOUSING SOCIETY, NO.1, DR. SIDDAIAH PURANIK ROAD, KHB COLONY, BASAVESHWARANAGAR, MAGADI ROAD, BENGALURU-560 079. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MANJUNATHA RAYAPPA., AGA FOR R1; SMT. SUMANA BALIGA., ADVOCATE FOR R2) Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:5460 WP No. 201 of 2020 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Sri.Prathap.S.S., counsel on behalf of Sri.Monesh Kumar.K.B., for the petitioner, Sri.Manjunatha Rayappa., AGA for respondent No.1 and Smt.Sumana Baliga.M., counsel for respondent No.2 have appeared in person. 2. The captioned Writ Petition is filed seeking a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent to consider the representation submitted by the petitioner on 20.08.2019 vide Annexure-M. 3. Heard the arguments and perused the Writ papers with care. 4. Counsel for the petitioner submits that a Mandamus may be ordered directing the second respondent to consider the representation submitted by the petitioner on 20.08.2019. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:5460 WP No. 201 of 2020 Counsel for the second respondent submits that an appropriate order may be passed. The oral submission made by counsel for the respective parties is placed on record. 5. A Mandamus is ordered directing the second respondent to consider representation submitted by the petitioner on 20.08.2019 vide Annexure-M and pass appropriate orders in accordance with the law within ten weeks. 6. Resultantly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. This Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP List No.: 2 Sl No.: 34