SRI VENKATASWAMAIAH @ VENKATASWAMY v. SRI GOVINDAIAH
RSA/1036/2021 · 2025-06-17
H P Sandesh
Original Suitbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 31441 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 31441 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:20804 RSA No. 1036 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.1036 OF 2021 (SP) BETWEEN:
1.
SRI. VENKATASWAMAIAH @ VENKATASWAMY S/O LATE SIDDAIAH AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS RESIDING AT BANAVARA POST YESHWANTHPURA HOBLI BENGALURU NORTH TALUK-560022. …APPELLANT
(BY SRI. V. RAJAIAH, ADVOCATE - ABSENT) AND:
1.
SRI. GOVINDAIAH S/O LATE OBALAIAH AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS
2.
SMT. THIMMAKKA D/O LATE OBALAIAH AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS
3.
SMT KEMPAMMA D/O LATE OBALAIAH AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS
4.
SRI VENKATESH S/O LATE OBALAIAH AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS
RESPONDENTS NO.1 TO 4 ARE RESIDING AT NAGENAHALLI VILLAGE
Digitally signed by DEVIKA M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:20804 RSA No. 1036 of 2021
MADURE HOBLI, DODDABALLAPURA TALUK-562120. …RESPONDENTS
THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 27.08.2021 PASSED IN R.A.NO.7/2020 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND DODDABALLAPURA, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 17.02.2020 PASSED IN O.S.NO.299/2017 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, DODDABALLAPURA.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR DISMISSAL THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
ORAL JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for the appellant is absent. This Court vide order dated 09.06.2025 taken note of the fact that learned counsel for the appellant was absent throughout before the Registrar as well as before this Court. However, in the ends of justice, on cost of Rs.1,000/-, granted a week’s time to comply with the office objections. Inspite of the same, the office objections are not complied and cost is also not paid and
learned counsel for the appellant is not interested in pursuing the matter. This Court also made it clear that, if cost is not paid and office objections are not complied, the appeal will be
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:20804 RSA No. 1036 of 2021
dismissed. Inspite of it, learned counsel for the appellant is absent today also.
Hence, the regular second appeal is dismissed for non- compliance of office objections and non-payment of cost.
Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE
ST List No.: 1 Sl No.: 61