Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 31436 (RAJ)

SACHIN MEENA, SON OF SHRI KHEMCHAND MEENA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMP/6669/2024 · 2025-05-09

Sameer Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:19722] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 6669/2024 1. Sachin Meena, Son Of Shri Khemchand Meena, Aged About 23 Years, Resident Of Village Nayabass, Police Station Aravali Vihar, Alwar, Rajasthan. 2. Netram, Son Of Shri Girraj Prjapat, Resident Of Village Doba Akbarpur, Police Station Akbarpur, District Aalwar (Raj.) 3. Amit, Son Of Shri Shivkumar Meena, Resident Of 147, Near Shiv Mandir Transformers Street, Nayabass, Police Station Aravali Vihar, District Alwar (Raj.) 4. Aakash Sain, Son Of Shri Sureshchand, Resident Of Prithivepura, Police Station Malakhera, District Alwar (Raj.) ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. 2. Devendra Kumar Son Of Shri Rameshavar Dayal, Resident Of Tihali, Tijara, District Kherthal, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Krishan Kumar Chhawal For State For Complainant : : Mr. M. S. Shekhawat, PP Mr. Rishi Raj Singh Rathore with Mr. Om Prakash, ASI, PS Aravali Vihar, Alwar Mr. Honey Saini for Mr. Shyam Sunder Varma HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 09/05/2025 This petition under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023 is filed with a prayer to quash the FIR No. 611/2023 registered at Police Station Aravali Vihar District Alwar for offences under Sections 323, 341, and 307 of IPC, on the basis of compromise effectuated between the parties herein, in respect of their inter-se dispute. [2025:RJ-JP:19722] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-6669/2024] Investigating Officer has marked presence in the Court and has submitted that though no criminal antecedents are registered against the petitioners, however in the investigation report it is reflected that victim was hospitalized for 10 days and has sustained life threatening injury on head and remained unconscious for a long period of time. Considering the foregoing facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is of the opinion that the instant matter does not fall under the parameters of compromise. Accordingly, present petition is dismissed. Pending application(s), if any, stand dismissed. (SAMEER JAIN),J Pooja /214