[2025:RJ-JP:5701] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15845/2024 Mudit Sharma S/o Late Shri Prem Chand Sharma, Aged About 57 Years, R/o B-615, Banipark, Jaipur At Present Working On The Post Of Junior Assistant, Govt. Rajshree College, Alwar (Raj.). ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, College Education, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Commissioner, College Education, Rajasthan, Shiksha Sankul, J.l.n. Marg, Jaipur. 3. Principal, Govt. Rajshree College Alwar. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) : Mr.Naman Dadhich on behalf of Mr.Aditya Singh JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 10/02/2025 1. No one has put in appearance on behalf of the petitioner. 2. By way of filing this petition, a prayer has been made for issuing directions to the respondents to accept the application filed by the petitioner seeking voluntary retirement. 3. Contents of the petition indicate that the petitioner has submitted an application before the Commissioner, College Education on 04.06.2024 seeking voluntary retirement with effect from 31.08.2024. [2025:RJ-JP:5701] (2 of 2) [CW-15845/2024] 4. When the application submitted by the petitioner was not decided by the respondents, the petitioner has approached this Court by way of filing this petition, with the above prayer. 5. Looking to the fact that the application submitted by the petitioner is still pending before the Commissioner, College Education, it is expected from him to decide the said application by passing a reasoned and speaking order. 6. The instant petition stands disposed of by issuing direction to the Commissioner, College Education to decide the application filed by the petitioner (pending, if any) expeditiously as early as possible, preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order, by passing a reasoned and speaking order. 7. Stay application and all pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. 8. Before parting with this order, it is made clear that this Court has not issued any order/ direction to the respondents to decide the application of the petitioner in a particular way, they would be at liberty to decide the same strictly in accordance with law. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Aayush Sharma /46