Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 31430 (KAR)

SRI DAYANANDA HEGDE v. THE BHAVASARA KSHATRIYA CO OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED

WP/22879/2021 · 2025-01-06

Jyoti Mulimani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:55 WP No. 22879 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 22879 OF 2021 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: SRI. DAYANANDA HEGDE AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, NO.B-301, B-BLOCK, "GREEN ELITE", NO.28/3, ST. ANTHONY ROAD, MARIYANNAPALYA H.A.FARM POST, BANGALORE-560 024. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. DILIP.M.R., ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND: THE BHAVASARA KSHATRIYA CO-OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED, HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT SAHAKARA SADANA, NO.63/67, 24TH CROSS, KILARI ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 053. REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED OFFICER. …RESPONDENT (SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:55 WP No. 22879 of 2021 ORAL ORDER When the case is called, the petitioner is not represented. When the case is listed and called out, the advocate must be present. The absence may affect the case. A perusal of the petition papers reveals that the petition is filed in the year 2021. Now we are in the month of January 2025. The petition is pending for almost four years. As already noted above, when the case is called, the petitioner is not represented. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE TKN List No.: 3 Sl No.: 13